2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09209-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia

Abstract: Anatolia was home to some of the earliest farming communities. It has been long debated whether a migration of farming groups introduced agriculture to central Anatolia. Here, we report the first genome-wide data from a 15,000-year-old Anatolian hunter-gatherer and from seven Anatolian and Levantine early farmers. We find high genetic continuity (~80–90%) between the hunter-gatherers and early farmers of Anatolia and detect two distinct incoming ancestries: an early Iranian/Caucasus related one and a later one… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
84
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(116 reference statements)
10
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, whereas a Near Eastern-related ancestry component is discerned in many of the Mesolithic HGs from the Iron Gates and other areas in the Balkan, Baltic or Scandinavia, this is not the case for any of the Villabruna cluster individuals. In contrast to previous statements that the Villabruna cluster individuals form a genetically homogenous group ( 16, 25 ), here the individuals show rather diverse ancestry profiles with various combinations of Sicily EM, EHG and GoyetQ2 -related ancestry. Since the Sicily LM HG gene pool contains the distinct Near Eastern-related ancestry but not the GoyetQ2 -related ancestry, it is unlikely that the diversity of this group originated solely from genetic drift from these Villabruna cluster individuals.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, whereas a Near Eastern-related ancestry component is discerned in many of the Mesolithic HGs from the Iron Gates and other areas in the Balkan, Baltic or Scandinavia, this is not the case for any of the Villabruna cluster individuals. In contrast to previous statements that the Villabruna cluster individuals form a genetically homogenous group ( 16, 25 ), here the individuals show rather diverse ancestry profiles with various combinations of Sicily EM, EHG and GoyetQ2 -related ancestry. Since the Sicily LM HG gene pool contains the distinct Near Eastern-related ancestry but not the GoyetQ2 -related ancestry, it is unlikely that the diversity of this group originated solely from genetic drift from these Villabruna cluster individuals.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The assigned ancestry components confirm both the substantial continuation of the local Sicily EM ancestry, and the influx of a non-local ancestry frsm (south-)eastern Europe, in Sicily during the Mesolithic. Moreover, the Upper Palaeolithic Pınarbaşı-related ancestry in the Sicily LM HGs is striking, and underlines previous indications for a pre-Neolithic genetic connection between the Near East and European HGs by at least 12,000 calBCE ( 16, 17, 25 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations