Late Life Employment Histories and Their Association With Work and Family Formation During Adulthood: A Sequence Analysis Based on ELSA

Abstract

ObjectivesTo extend research on workforce participation beyond age 50 by describing entire employment histories in later life and testing their links to prior life course conditions.MethodsWe use data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, with retrospective information on employment histories between age 50 and 70 for 1,103 men and 1,195 women (n = 2,298). We apply sequence analysis and group respondents into eight clusters with similar histories. Using multinomial regressions, we then test their links to labor market participation, partnership, and parenthood histories during early (age 20–34) and mid-adulthood (age 35–49).ResultsThree clusters include histories dominated by full-time employees but with varying age of retirement (before, at, and after age 60). One cluster is dominated by self-employment with comparatively later retirement. Remaining clusters include part-time work (retirement around age 60 or no retirement), continuous domestic work (mostly women), or other forms of nonemployment. Those who had strong attachments to the labor market during adulthood are more likely to have histories of full-time work up until and beyond age 60, especially men. Parenthood in early adulthood is related to later retirement (for men only). Continued domestic work was not linked to parenthood. Partnered women tend to work part-time or do domestic work. The findings remain consistent after adjusting for birth cohort, childhood adversity, life course health, and occupational position.DiscussionPolicies aimed at increasing the proportion of older workers not only need to address later stages of the life course but also early and mid-adulthood.

The early retiree divests the health workforce: a quantitative analysis of early retirement among Canadian Registered Nurses and allied health professionals

“…Elder’s [10] Life Course Perspective guided our conceptualization of retirement; notably, this perspective encourages interdisciplinarity and recognizes the value of micro-, meso-, and macro-level factors in the study of individual life courses [10]. This perspective is commonly applied in studies of retirement [11–15]. All identified factors were incorporated into one of eight categories of predictors of early retirement among RNs and AHPs.…”

Retirement Trajectories in Countries with Flexible Retirement Policies but Different Welfare Regimes

“…Instead, we observe an increasing de-standardization of retirement transitions, with individuals continuing to work after retirement, retiring after long-term inactivity or unemployment, or 'unretiring' (Baumann, 2016;Platts et al, 2017). This development calls for a methodological approach that allows an examination of retirement not as a one-time shift from full-time employment to full-time retirement but, rather, as a transition process that unfolds in the years leading up to and beyond the ages of statutory retirement Duberley & Carmichael, 2016;Wahrendorf, Zaninotto, Hoven, Head, & Carr, 2017). In this study, we use a trajectory approach, which allows us to not only take the variation in individuals' retirement patterns into account but also to study retirement as a long-term process.…”

Aging in Different Welfare Contexts: A Comparative Perspective on Later-Life Employment and Health

“…Instead, scholars have stressed the need to examine later-life employment trajectories in the years leading up to and beyond the traditional FPA ( Madero-Cabib, 2016 ; Wahrendorf, Akinwale, Landy, Matthews, & Blane, 2017 ; Wahrendorf, Zaninotto, Hoven, Head, & Carr, 2017 ; Worts, Corna, Sacker, McMunn, & McDonough, 2016 ). The findings from these studies clearly show that the conventional retirement transition —that is, a one-time labor market exit at the FPA after working in a long-term, full-time job—is not the norm for men and women in many countries.…”