2013
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182845f6c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Acute Liver Allograft Rejection; A Study of Its Natural History and Graft Survival in the Current Era

Abstract: LAR continues to provide a risk to patient and graft survival: understanding risk factors may allow an improvement in monitoring and early intervention and so prevent early graft loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of late SCR remained unclear. However, late episodes of ACR were shown to be associated with poorer clinical outcome compared to early episodes of ACR …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The role of late SCR remained unclear. However, late episodes of ACR were shown to be associated with poorer clinical outcome compared to early episodes of ACR …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, AR still remains a crucial determining factor which influences the short-term function and long-term outcome of both recipients and allografts [38][40]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis focusing on the combined effects of TGFB1 +869 T/C and +915 G/C polymorphisms on AR risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this study, patients with high-risk disease tended to have a higher Scheuer score at their first biopsy, although there was no clear-cut off point. The cholangitis component of the Nakanuma score (Carbone et al, 2013, Thurairajah et al, 2013) appeared to enable a degree of differentiation between high- and low-risk disease, but the hepatitis component did not. It was notable, however, that all patients with high-risk disease had evidence of ductopenia on biopsy, only present in one low risk patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%