2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-020-01149-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngeal Dysplasia: Persisting Dilemmas, Disagreements and Unsolved Problems—A Short Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As dysplasia grading is difficult and reproducibility between pathologists is low to moderate, a blind reviewed test set was generated in order to properly assess the AI model performance. We observed that the agreement between the two reviewers on this test set was in line with previous reports (6,8–11), illustrating once more the difficulty to obtain objective and robust grading of head and neck dysplasia and the need for new tools to help pathologists make reliable diagnoses. We developed and trained a weakly supervised deep learning model that was able to accurately grade head and neck dysplasia, offering a first tool for assisted diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As dysplasia grading is difficult and reproducibility between pathologists is low to moderate, a blind reviewed test set was generated in order to properly assess the AI model performance. We observed that the agreement between the two reviewers on this test set was in line with previous reports (6,8–11), illustrating once more the difficulty to obtain objective and robust grading of head and neck dysplasia and the need for new tools to help pathologists make reliable diagnoses. We developed and trained a weakly supervised deep learning model that was able to accurately grade head and neck dysplasia, offering a first tool for assisted diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The classification of head and neck dysplasias has been a highly controversial issue for many years. Indeed, since the first classification proposed by Kleinsasser in 1963 (5), many different classifications have been proposed by expert pathologists without achieving a strong consensus (6,7). Each of them had different terminologies and methods of grading, but their reproducibility was always low to moderate (6,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aufgenommen wurden Fälle mit gutartigen Stimmlippenveränderungen, Dysplasien und Plattenepithelkarzinomen der Stimmlippen. Der verwendete histopathologische Befund enthielt eine Diagnose auf der Grundlage der Klassifikation von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren von 2005 oder (je nach Erstellungsdatum) 2017 gemäß WHO (Weltgesundheitsorganisation) und diente als Goldstandard [ 11 ]. Für die statistische Auswertung der Ergebnisse wurde jeder Befund je nach histologischer Dignität einer der folgenden Diagnosegruppen zugeordnet: Diagnosegruppe A (benigne Läsion oder geringgradige bzw.…”
Section: Materials Und Methodenunclassified
“…While the rate of malignant transformation varies widely with estimates as low as 1.7% and as high as 46.3% [3] , early diagnosis and treatment of vocal cord leukoplakia may prevent progression and malignancy [4] . The 2017 World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors proposed a two-tier classification system for dysplasia, with reasonably clear histopathological criteria for the two groups: 1) low-grade (LG) dysplasia including squamous hyperplasia and mild dysplasia, and 2) high-grade (HG) dysplasia including moderate and severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ [5,6] . In response to this classification, some otolaryngologists proposed that patients in the LG group of vocal cord leukoplakia with a low malignancy risk would generally require a conservative treatment or watchand-wait policy, whereas patients in the HG group of vocal cord leukoplakia would demand both surgical treatment and close follow-up to monitor possible progression to a more aggressive pathology [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%