2001
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.64.042112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larmor precession and barrier tunneling time of a neutral spinning particle

Abstract: The Larmor precession of a neutral spinning particle in a magnetic field confined to the region of a one dimensional-rectangular barrier is investigated for both a nonrelativistic and a relativistic incoming particle. The spin precession serves as a clock to measure the time spent by a quantum particle traversing a potential barrier. With the help of general spin coherent state it is explicitly shown that the precession time is equal to the dwell time in both the nonrelativistic and relativistic cases. We also… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Larmor time has been shown to equal the dwell time for both relativistic and nonrelativistic particles [19,20,25].…”
Section: ͑15͒mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Larmor time has been shown to equal the dwell time for both relativistic and nonrelativistic particles [19,20,25].…”
Section: ͑15͒mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This effect has recently been explained as arising from the saturation of stored energy or number of particles under the barrier [11][12][13]. With some exceptions [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], most discussions of quantum tunneling time have been based on the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation even when apparent "faster than c" effects are considered. In particular there has been no discussion of the relation between the various tunneling times for relativistic particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equality is proven for the double Dirac δ-barrier in Appendix D and actually holds true for more general cases. 23,25,26,44 Note that in our calculation, we only consider slowmoving particle, like neutron or Ag atom (for the numerical examples presented here, the particle is taken as "neutral electron" with (v/c) ≤ 0.6% for simplicity), so the relevant Hamiltonian is the nonrelativistic Schrödinger-Pauli HamiltonianĤ = (p 2 /2m) + V (x) −μ · Bχ(x). In the Schrödinger picture, d Ŝ /dt = (1/i ) [Ŝ,Ĥ] = μ×B χ(x), so Ŝ stops running when particle leaves the nonzero magnetic region.…”
Section: The Double Dirac δ-Barrier Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janosfalvi et al [16] described the numerous phenomenological equations used in the study of the behavior of single-domain magnetic nano-particles. Li et al [17] investigated the Larmor precession of a neutral spinning particle in a magnetic field confined to the region of a one-dimensional rectangular barrier. Guo et al [18] proposed an experimental method to detect the Larmor precession of a single spin with a spin-polarized tunneling current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%