2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00140-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone–implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
177
2
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
177
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Each part of the assembly was given appropriate material properties as adopted in previous studies 14,15 (Table 1). Homogeneity, isotropy, and linear elasticity were assumed for both the OMI and bone, and a friction coefficient of 0.3 16,17 between the microimplant and both cortical and cancellous parts was assigned, while contact between the latter two parts was assigned as an intimate with no friction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each part of the assembly was given appropriate material properties as adopted in previous studies 14,15 (Table 1). Homogeneity, isotropy, and linear elasticity were assumed for both the OMI and bone, and a friction coefficient of 0.3 16,17 between the microimplant and both cortical and cancellous parts was assigned, while contact between the latter two parts was assigned as an intimate with no friction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice significantly decreases the computational cost required for the stability analysis based on a non-linear frictional contact model (Viceconti et al, 2000).…”
Section: D Fem Model Of the Femurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, more detailed models on bone resorption (Boyle and Kim, 2011a, b;Weinans et al, 1992a;Weinans et al, 1992b) and implant stability (Abdul-Kadir et al, 2008;Viceconti et al, 2006;Viceconti et al, 2001;Viceconti et al, 2000) could be used to assess both the short and long term performance of the implant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osseointegration refers to the bone healing process. The incapability of the implant surface to bond with the adjoining bone and tissues leads to micro-motions and formation of a fibrous tissue around the implant promoting aseptic loosening process (Viceconti, Muccini et al 2000;Geetha, Singh et al 2008). The biocompatibility for total joint replacements has been defined as; optimizing the rate and quality of bone apposition to the material, minimizing the release rate of corrosion and the tissue response to the released particles, minimizing the release rate of wear debris and the tissue reaction to this debris, and optimizing the biomechanical environment to minimize disturbance to homeostasis in the bone and its surrounding soft tissue (Williams 2008).…”
Section: Biomaterials Requirements For Femoral Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%