2019
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale analysis of human gene expression variability associates highly variable drug targets with lower drug effectiveness and safety

Abstract: Motivation The effectiveness of drugs tends to vary between patients. One of the well-known reasons for this phenomenon is genetic polymorphisms in drug target genes among patients. Here, we propose that differences in expression levels of drug target genes across individuals can also contribute to this phenomenon. Results To explore this hypothesis, we analyzed the expression variability of protein-coding genes, and particul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two gene expression resources were used to determine variability in population mRNA levels for IED-implicated genes: the GTEx [9] and the Eye Genotype Expression (EyeGEx) [18] databases. The GTEx v8 dataset (accessed September 2019) consisting of 948 donors, and 17,382 samples from Variability in mRNA levels in the population was assessed for the entire GTEx v8 dataset using a method similar to that developed by Simonovsky et al and using parameters broadly in keeping with those used by the GTEx consortium [19]. First, raw gene read data were downloaded from the GTEx web server and normalized to obtain the same library size for every sample for each tissue using the trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) method implemented in edgeR [20].…”
Section: Identifying Genes That Are Possibly Associated With Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two gene expression resources were used to determine variability in population mRNA levels for IED-implicated genes: the GTEx [9] and the Eye Genotype Expression (EyeGEx) [18] databases. The GTEx v8 dataset (accessed September 2019) consisting of 948 donors, and 17,382 samples from Variability in mRNA levels in the population was assessed for the entire GTEx v8 dataset using a method similar to that developed by Simonovsky et al and using parameters broadly in keeping with those used by the GTEx consortium [19]. First, raw gene read data were downloaded from the GTEx web server and normalized to obtain the same library size for every sample for each tissue using the trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) method implemented in edgeR [20].…”
Section: Identifying Genes That Are Possibly Associated With Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, raw gene read data were downloaded from the GTEx web server and normalized to obtain the same library size for every sample for each tissue using the trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) method implemented in edgeR [20]. Prior to normalization, genes with at most 10 reads in all samples were removed to exclude lowly expressed genes, as these were considered to represent noise [19]. A comprehensive list of protein-coding genes was obtained from Ensembl Biomart [21].…”
Section: Identifying Genes That Are Possibly Associated With Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These well-established gender differences in the effectiveness of vaccines against infectious diseases contrast with the evidence on drugs and other methods of disease control. In their analysis of the effectiveness of 113 drugs Simonovsky et al (2019) find no systematic differences between men and women. Only for drugs acting on the central nervous system, such as anti-psychotic drugs and antidepressants, as well as beta-blockers, reducing the heart rate and systolic blood pressure there is weak evidence for more beneficial effects in women compared to men (Franconi et al 2007).…”
Section: Gender Differences Related To Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in mRNA levels in the population was assessed for the entire GTEx v8 dataset using a method similar to that developed by Simonovsky et al and using parameters broadly in keeping with those used by the GTEx Consortium [19]. First, raw gene read data were downloaded from the GTEx web server and normalized to obtain the same library size for every sample for each tissue using the trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) method implemented in edgeR [20].…”
Section: Identifying Genes That Are Possibly Associated With Variablementioning
confidence: 99%