2019
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Intracellular Domain-Dependent Effects of Positive Allosteric Modulators on Glycine Receptors

Abstract: Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are members of the pentameric ligandgated ionic channel family (pLGICs) and mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain stem and spinal cord. The function of GlyRs can be modulated by positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). So far, it is largely accepted that both the extracellular (ECD) and transmembrane (TMD) domains constitute the primary target for many of these PAMs. On the other hand, the contribution of the intracellular domain (ICD) to the PAM effects on GlyRs remain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A change in the volume and polarity of these cavities implicates a role in state-dependent effects of the modulators on channel function 52,53 . Also of note, is the role of the ICD in imparting sensitivity to allosteric ligands in GlyR modulation 54 .…”
Section: The M4 Conformation and The Effect On Intra-subunit And Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the volume and polarity of these cavities implicates a role in state-dependent effects of the modulators on channel function 52,53 . Also of note, is the role of the ICD in imparting sensitivity to allosteric ligands in GlyR modulation 54 .…”
Section: The M4 Conformation and The Effect On Intra-subunit And Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using computational electrophysiology on a reduced molecular system composed of the trans-membrane domain only in a lipid bilayer and harmonic restraints on the heavy atoms (Figure 1), we have analyzed the ion conductance and selectivity of D&B-open and compared with single-channel electrophysiology; see SI for a justification of the setup. The numerical results collected at a transmembrane potential of 150 mV or 250 mV , which was introduced via a constant electric field (Roux, 2008; Gumbart et al, 2012) or charge imbalance (Sachs et al, 2004; Kutzner et al, 2011) (Figure S1 and SI), indicate that the conductance of D&B-open ranges from 382 ps to 480 ps , which is about five-fold higher than the experimental value of 86 pS (Bormann et al, 1993; Moorhouse et al, 2002; Moroni et al, 2011a; Scott et al, 2015; Lara et al, 2019); see Table S1. Moreover, in-silico permeation assays using a series of polyatomic anions, which were originally used to probe the size of the GlyR ion pore at physiological conditions (Bormann et al, 1987; Rundstrom et al, 1994; Lee et al, 2003), indicate that D&B-open is not only too conductive but also non-selective to the size of the anion, in clear contradiction with the experiments; see Table S2.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Fourth, both modeling (Cerdan et al, 2018) and structural biology (Yu et al, 2019) consistently indicate that the GlyR conductance at physiological conditions, i.e. 18 88 pS (Bormann et al, 1993; Moorhouse et al, 2002; Moroni et al, 2011a; Scott et al, 2015; Lara et al, 2019), does not require the permeation of fully hydrated chloride ions (i.e. 3.2 Å in radius).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…HEK 293 cells (CRL-1573; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured using standard methods ( Lara et al., 2019 ). The cells were transfected using XfectTM Transfection Reagent (Clontech, USA) using 1.0 μg of cDNA plasmid encoding the rat GlyR α 3 subunit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%