2015
DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Rectoanal Intussusception

Abstract: Evacuation proctography showed anatomical correction in patients with rectoanal intussusception who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. However, the data also indicate that such correction does not necessarily result in meaningful symptomatic relief.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(25 reference statements)
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postoperative proctography revealed that RAI persisted in one patient, while in nine patients the RAI was replaced by RRI. Enterocoele disappeared in all three patients, though the site of the small bowel moved posteriorly to a point along the rectum in two patients, as was shown in our previous study . Grade 1 rectocoele was found in six patients (Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Postoperative proctography revealed that RAI persisted in one patient, while in nine patients the RAI was replaced by RRI. Enterocoele disappeared in all three patients, though the site of the small bowel moved posteriorly to a point along the rectum in two patients, as was shown in our previous study . Grade 1 rectocoele was found in six patients (Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Formijne Jonkers et al [18] have recently reported that 157 patients underwent LVR for RAI, and FI improved or was cured in 78 % of the patients. Similar functional results were reported by other authors [5,6,19,20]. These results suggest that the correction of the anterior rectum may be more important for the treatment of FI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In patients with RAI, RAI disappeared in all 28 patients except one, and the mean size of the associated rectocele ( n = 14) was significantly reduced [29 (15–59) mm preoperative vs 6 (0–27) mm postoperative, P < 0.0001]. These findings in earlier series of patients were reported previously .…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methods Advantages and Disadvantagessupporting
confidence: 81%