2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Explantation and Implantation at Academic Centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we found explantation of an eroded gastric band to be associated with longer postoperative hospital stay (6.5±12.0 days), a high serious morbidity rate (Clavien 3a, 3b in 10.3%), and a high percentage of intensive care unit admissions (Clavien 4 in 5.1%). Other studies have similarly shown that AGB revision or explantation procedures are associated with higher rates of morbidity than primary AGB implantation 192021. In the present study, the incidence of severe morbidities associated with AGB explantation was higher than in other similar studies, which we believe was because half of the serious complications encountered in the present study occurred during the initial period (2010–2011), when our experience with eroded AGB explantation was not sufficient 17…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In particular, we found explantation of an eroded gastric band to be associated with longer postoperative hospital stay (6.5±12.0 days), a high serious morbidity rate (Clavien 3a, 3b in 10.3%), and a high percentage of intensive care unit admissions (Clavien 4 in 5.1%). Other studies have similarly shown that AGB revision or explantation procedures are associated with higher rates of morbidity than primary AGB implantation 192021. In the present study, the incidence of severe morbidities associated with AGB explantation was higher than in other similar studies, which we believe was because half of the serious complications encountered in the present study occurred during the initial period (2010–2011), when our experience with eroded AGB explantation was not sufficient 17…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This suggests a transition from LRYGB toward LSG over the study period, a trend that has been demonstrated in a number of other recent studies. (1921)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relevant fact is that the most common procedure related to the adjustable gastric band is not its implantation, but its explantation. The removal of an adjustable gastric band and its conversion to a sleeve gastrectomy or a Roux en Y gastric bypass, either as a two-stage or a single-stage operation, has become a frequent revisional bariatric operation at academic centers, particularly as of 2013 [12]. Compared to the more powerful effects of the sleeve gastrectomy or the Roux en Y gastric bypass, it is logical to see the reason for not choosing this procedure nowadays, since it lacks the metabolic component that the other two operations mentioned above offer, and it has a potential to produce a 30% excess weight loss at 1 year, which is lower than the excess weight loss produced by the sleeve gastrectomy or the Roux en Y gastric bypass.…”
Section: Adjustable Gastric Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%