2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-022-04491-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility prediction using artificial neural networks, SVMs and random forest: hyperparameters tuning by genetic optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After creating a landslide prediction map using several models, one of the essential steps is verifying the results' accuracy [ 126 , 127 , 128 ]. LSMs generated by five algorithms (IOE, SI, MIV, FR, and EBF) in the present investigation were validated by comparing the susceptibility map with both the training and validating datasets [ 58 , 129 ].…”
Section: Database and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After creating a landslide prediction map using several models, one of the essential steps is verifying the results' accuracy [ 126 , 127 , 128 ]. LSMs generated by five algorithms (IOE, SI, MIV, FR, and EBF) in the present investigation were validated by comparing the susceptibility map with both the training and validating datasets [ 58 , 129 ].…”
Section: Database and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperparameters are parameters that are set prior to the execution of the algorithm. In order to obtain more accurate models it is necessary to adjust these parameters, which can be done by the trial and error method [44]. Table 4 shows the configuration of the main hyperparameters considered for the RF model, and Table 5 shows those corresponding to the XGBoost model.…”
Section: Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badola et al [43] conducted a landslide susceptibility analysis using XGBoost in the Chamoli district (India) and obtained a satisfactory performance. Daviran et al [44] compared three ML techniques (SVM, ANN, and RF) in the Tarom-Khalkhal sub-basin (Iran) and obtained superior performance with RF. Sahin [16] developed a framework for LSM in the Babadag district (Turkey) and obtained excellent performance with both XGBoost and RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been plenty of excellent works in landslide susceptibility evaluation (LSE, also called as landslide susceptibility mapping, LSM), and a variety of algorithms were suggested or employed in these works. These diverse methods typically consist of logic regression (Shou and Chen, 2021;Ge et al, 2022), weights of evidence (Goyes-Penafiel and Hernandez-Rojas, 2021), fuzzy logic (Nwazelibe et al, 2023), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Wadadar and Mukhopadhyay, 2022), Information value (Es-Smairi et al, 2022), statistical index model (Berhane and Tadesse, 2021), support vector machine (SVM) (Daviran et al, 2022), random forest (RF) (Taalab et al, 2018), convolutional neural network (CNN) (Aslam et al, 2022), recurrent neural network (Ngo et al, 2021), and ensemble learning [such as boosted regression tree-random forest (Chowdhuri et al, 2021), random forest-cusp catastrophe model (Sun et al, 2022), CNN with metaheuristic optimization (Hakim et al, 2022), and so on]. Hakim et al (2022) suggested two ensemble deep learning models including the ensemble of CNN and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and the complex model of CNN and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%