2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility assessment using Frequency Ratio, a case study of northern Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
91
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency ratio (FR) model represents a bivariate statistical method which is widely used in research for landslide and flood prediction mapping [24,29,31,32,47,63]. The present paper proposes the use of the FR model to map the areas prone to floods and flash-floods in the Buzău river catchment.…”
Section: Frequency Ratio Model (Fr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency ratio (FR) model represents a bivariate statistical method which is widely used in research for landslide and flood prediction mapping [24,29,31,32,47,63]. The present paper proposes the use of the FR model to map the areas prone to floods and flash-floods in the Buzău river catchment.…”
Section: Frequency Ratio Model (Fr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the abovementioned analyses were translated into a GIS environment, thus resulting in flood and flash-flood hazard maps. These methods are widely used in research in studies which aim to provide landslide or flood mapping [24,[31][32][33][34]. The performance validation of the proposed models has been done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ayalew et al, 2004(Ayalew et al, , 2005Basharat et al, 2016;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Rozos et al, 2011;Shahabi and Hashim, 2015;Süzen and Doyuran, 2004). Previously, landslide susceptibility maps of different fragments of northern Pakistan were prepared Basharat et al, 2016;Ahmed et al, 2014;Kamp et al, 2008;Kanwal et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2018;Rahim et al, 2018) (Table 1). They used a single model-based method, except two (Ahmed et al, 2014;Bacha et al, 2018) compared performances of two different models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used a single model-based method, except two (Ahmed et al, 2014;Bacha et al, 2018) compared performances of two different models. Ahmed et al (2014), Kanwal et al (2016) and Rahim et al (2018) used a regional geological map (1 : 500 000) to produce a landslide susceptibility map of the Upper Indus basin, whereas inventories were based on published rock avalanche maps (Kanwal et al, 2016), geomorphological mapping (Ahmed et al, 2014), co-seismic landslides (Basharat et al, 2016) and remote sensing along with field mapping Khan et al, 2018). Geological, geomorphological and human-induced parameters were also considered for production of susceptibility maps (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paola Reichenbach et al (2018) classed 23 landslide impact factors into five groups of causatives which are: geological, hydrological, land cover, morphological and other factors. Nevertheless, the proportion of contribution of the causative factors to landslide occurrence is different depending on spatial, temporal distributions of the event [1,2,3,4,5]. Recent studies which focus on Asian countries such as China, Taiwan, Korea and Japan indicate that duration and magnitude of rainfall are primary causatives of landslides in mountainous areas [3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%