2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-010-0185-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape multifunctionality: a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change

Abstract: The interdisciplinary concept of landscape multifunctionality provides a suitable platform to combine or disentangle effects of multiple environmental stressors acting on the landscape. The concept allows mapping of trade-offs, synergies, and priority conflicts between individual landscape functions, thus providing easily accessible, hands-on means to communicate findings of environmental research to decision makers and society. This rapid communication provides an overview of current developments and potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscapes are increasingly being understood as multifunctional and dynamic entities of social and ecological systems; that is, spatially and/or temporally defined entities where multiple functions and values associated with natural, cultural and societal values are integrated in the interests of both existing and potential land users (Angelstam et al 2015;Bolliger et al 2010;Brandt & Vejre 2004;de Groot 2006;Gallent et al 2004;Selman 2012;Termorshuizen & Opdam 2009). Many critical landscape functions are affected by human interactions with natural processes (Termorshuizen & Opdam 2009), such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, economic productivity, energy security, public health and wellbeing, social cohesion and aesthetic beauty (Bolliger et al 2010;Brandt & Vejre 2004). Consequently, policy-makers, scientists and practitioners have raised arguments for a landscape perspective in land-use planning and management where values, interests and needs are integrated.…”
Section: The Landscape Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landscapes are increasingly being understood as multifunctional and dynamic entities of social and ecological systems; that is, spatially and/or temporally defined entities where multiple functions and values associated with natural, cultural and societal values are integrated in the interests of both existing and potential land users (Angelstam et al 2015;Bolliger et al 2010;Brandt & Vejre 2004;de Groot 2006;Gallent et al 2004;Selman 2012;Termorshuizen & Opdam 2009). Many critical landscape functions are affected by human interactions with natural processes (Termorshuizen & Opdam 2009), such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, economic productivity, energy security, public health and wellbeing, social cohesion and aesthetic beauty (Bolliger et al 2010;Brandt & Vejre 2004). Consequently, policy-makers, scientists and practitioners have raised arguments for a landscape perspective in land-use planning and management where values, interests and needs are integrated.…”
Section: The Landscape Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when several components (e.g. habitats) and demands on landscapes are considered simultaneously, land use conflicts may occur (Bolliger et al 2010;Monroe & Butler 2015). Since planning processes are dependent on social structures of institutions and systems (Roe 2007), a feasible integrated landscape planning (ILP) approach could provide an inter-sectoral framework by functioning as an "umbrella" that connects demands and planning tools from different sectors (Brandt & Vejre 2004;Carvalho-Ribeiro et al 2010;Cullotta et al 2015;Dolman et al 2001;MacFarlane 2007).…”
Section: The Landscape Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas some functions may be spatially and temporally segregated, others may become effective at the same location at the same time (Bolliger et al. ). Therefore, the impact and functional consequence of natural resource management actions, such as re‐vegetation, is fundamentally determined by their location in the landscape (Hobbs and Saunders , Lamb et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For restoring forest functions within the landscape, one of the intentions is to identify trade-offs and synergies (so-called winwin situations), for which the concept of multifunctionality is important (Brown 2005). Whereas some functions may be spatially and temporally segregated, others may become effective at the same location at the same time (Bolliger et al 2011). Therefore, the impact and functional consequence of natural resource management actions, such as re-vegetation, is fundamentally determined by their location in the landscape Saunders 1991, Lamb et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape pattern changes may alter the number and type of patches (Bodart et al 2011;Li et al 2013;Salvati et al 2013;Liu et al 2014). These landscape pattern changes can have deleterious effects on natural habitats and population of many wildlife species (Fauth et al 2000;Bolliger et al 2011;Salvati et al 2013;Buchmann et al 2013;Makki et al 2013). Land use/cover change via altering habitat area and spatial distribution of habitat patches affect the structure and spatial heterogeneity of a landscape (Broadbent et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%