2010
DOI: 10.5589/m11-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use/cover classification of a complex agricultural landscape using single-dated very high spatial resolution satellite-sensed imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using only two land cover classes as a method of monitoring forest change, Woodcock et al, (2001) noted that spatial extension is possible, and in fact comparable to other methods, but only when used for nearby scenes. This observation supports the findings of other authors who noted that the success of land cover classification is hampered when an area is heterogeneous, as geographical complexity can have a negative effect on the spectral separability of classes and can reduce classification accuracy (Okubo et al, 2010). Spectral separability measures have been used to provide an indication of the potential accuracy of land cover classifications (Su et al, 2010) in heterogeneous areas.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Using only two land cover classes as a method of monitoring forest change, Woodcock et al, (2001) noted that spatial extension is possible, and in fact comparable to other methods, but only when used for nearby scenes. This observation supports the findings of other authors who noted that the success of land cover classification is hampered when an area is heterogeneous, as geographical complexity can have a negative effect on the spectral separability of classes and can reduce classification accuracy (Okubo et al, 2010). Spectral separability measures have been used to provide an indication of the potential accuracy of land cover classifications (Su et al, 2010) in heterogeneous areas.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, the VHR image bands or the combination of VHR and GLCM increase the OA by as much as 0.0536. Both Trias-Sanz et al [21] and Okubo et al [20] also found that the GLCM did not improve the GEOBIA LULC classification in very high resolution imagery (aerial and QuickBird). Since adding the GLCM to the S2 data has a bigger contribution than when added to the S2i and S2+ data, we can derive that the indices are enough to classify land use at the object level.…”
Section: Improvements Adding the Glcmmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The combination of textural and spectral information in their GEOBIA approach improved the classification. However, the texture indices from GLCM should not be included in the segmentation process to generate objects because GLCM extracts pixel-wise metrics using a sliding window and when encountering heterogeneous classes, high contrast will be detected [20]. For example, a forest is a heavily textured patch due to the variation in vegetation and shadows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed and precise information on land use and land cover (LULC) in rural areas is essential to establish sustainable rural development and ecosystem management [1,2]. After years of China's policies such as land exploitation, consolidation, rehabilitation, and the "new countryside" policy, rural settlements have changed enormously in terms of their amount, location, composition, and configuration [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%