2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar flame speeds of methane/air mixtures at engine conditions: Performance of different kinetic models and power-law correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the existing literatures, ,, power-law correlations were used to fit the stoichiometric methane–air laminar flame speed at 0.1 MPa. However, as shown in Figure , the discrepancy is quite large when the preheating temperature is high ( T u > 550 K).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literatures, ,, power-law correlations were used to fit the stoichiometric methane–air laminar flame speed at 0.1 MPa. However, as shown in Figure , the discrepancy is quite large when the preheating temperature is high ( T u > 550 K).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations of both Bunsen flames and SEFs, the detailed kinetic model for methane oxidation, GRI-Mech 3.0, 50 is used and the mixture-averaged transport model is used for the diffusion velocity. It is noted that recently several kinetic models have been developed for methane, and their performance in predicting premixed methane/air flames was assessed by Wang et al 51 They found that, at ambient conditions, the results predicted by seven kinetic models are very close, while larger discrepancy is observed for engine-relevant conditions. 51 Because this work considers premixed flames at normal temperature and pressure, GRI-Mech 3.0 is used here, and the present conclusions are expected to be independent of the kinetic model used in simulations.…”
Section: Bunsen Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that recently several kinetic models have been developed for methane, and their performance in predicting premixed methane/air flames was assessed by Wang et al 51 They found that, at ambient conditions, the results predicted by seven kinetic models are very close, while larger discrepancy is observed for engine-relevant conditions. 51 Because this work considers premixed flames at normal temperature and pressure, GRI-Mech 3.0 is used here, and the present conclusions are expected to be independent of the kinetic model used in simulations. If HRR under engine-relevant conditions is studied in future works, GRI-Mech 3.0 should not be used.…”
Section: Bunsen Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHEMKIN III is a software whose purpose is to facilitate the formation, solution, and interpretation of problems involving elementary gas-phase chemical kinetics. The thermodynamic data pertaining to substances related to each unit reaction were extracted from NASA CEA code [22,23] and GRI Mech 3.0 code [24,25] databases. Table 1 lists the experimental and modeling conditions.…”
Section: Experimental and Modeling Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%