2007
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lag correction model and ghosting analysis for an indirect‐conversion flat‐panel imager

Abstract: Cone‐beam digital tomosynthesis (CBDT) is a new approach that was recently proposed for rapid tomographic imaging of soft‐tissue targets in the radiotherapy treatment room. One of the potential problems in implementing CBDT using, for example, megavoltage (MV) X rays is the possibility of artifacts caused by image lag and ghosting of the X‐ray detector used. In the present work, we developed a model to correct for image lag with indirect‐conversion flat‐panel imagers (FPIs) used for MV‐CBDT. This model is base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both these consequences could be overcome with an adequate image lag correction as has been proposed. 21 In our method, 100 frames where averaged to decrease noise and capture a "snap shot" of the treatment delivery, including that of a dead mouse. In future implementations, this number may be reduced in an effort to capture intrafaction motion of small animals during treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both these consequences could be overcome with an adequate image lag correction as has been proposed. 21 In our method, 100 frames where averaged to decrease noise and capture a "snap shot" of the treatment delivery, including that of a dead mouse. In future implementations, this number may be reduced in an effort to capture intrafaction motion of small animals during treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image lag is often difficult to correct without the equipment necessary to measure the response of the OBI device to an xray impulse. 21 Therefore, to reduce the effects of image lag during irradiations of the OBI device without a complicated correction model, an average image consisting of 100 frames is acquired following the first 300 frames of irradiation so that image intensities would approach a steady-state condition. To access the influence of image lag for this acquisition protocol a falling-edge response step response function was used by rapidly cutting power to the x-ray tube and measuring the residual image signal (i.e., lag).…”
Section: Iic1 Minimizing Obi Perturbations Image: Lag and Scatter-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, these types of artifacts are not apparent in the reconstruction, suggesting adequate temporal performance of the scintillator relative to the amount of noise present on the detector. However, in lower noise modes or dose regimes, or higher frame‐rate modes, where lag artifacts may become more apparent in the reconstruction, lag‐mitigation strategies and algorithms may be employed …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMS separation of the marker configuration, f k , and the distance between the configuration centroid to the target, d k , is best for the in-FOV, slightly better for out-FOV 45-180 than Cloud, and worst for out-FOV 45- affected by lag. A variety of lag correction techniques 48 are applicable and could reduce the systematic error is x I . An automatic image-to-world registration method has been developed that demonstrates accuracy and reproducibility consistently at or better than that of the conventional manual technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%