2000
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2000)019<1036:ltfvia>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory to Field Validation in an Integrative Assessment of an Acid Mine Drainage–impacted Watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). These results support the conclusions of other studies that have recognized the value of EPT metrics as indicators of metals toxicity in streams (Carlisle and Clements 1999;Soucek et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). These results support the conclusions of other studies that have recognized the value of EPT metrics as indicators of metals toxicity in streams (Carlisle and Clements 1999;Soucek et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Mayflies and stoneflies are among the most sensitive macroinvertebrate groups to heavy metals contamination in streams (Burrows and Whitton 1983;Kiffney and Clements 1994). However, there is some indication that their tolerances to metals may be partially pH dependent (Feldmann and Connor 1992 metrics such as total and EPT taxa richness are among the best indicator metrics for detecting these impacts (Soucek et al 2000;Clements et al 2000). A decrease in total macroinvertebrate taxa richness and the number of mayfly and stonefly taxa between pre-and postmining periods was previously reported in the same reaches of Bee Fork and Strother Creek that included our sites BF4 and SC2, respectively (Ryck 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Such waters are commonly called acid mine drainage (AMD) because sulfides are often associated with valued minerals such as metal ores and coal, and mineral extraction often exposes associated sulfides to the ambient environment. Damaging effects of drainage from sulfide oxidation associated with mining have been described by authors for several millennia (as noted by Seal and Shanks 2008), and more recently in Asia (David 2003), New Zealand (Winterbourn et al 2000), Europe (Casiot et al 2009;Gray and Delaney 2008), USA (Cherry et al 2001;Freund and Petty 2007;Courtney and Clements 2000;Kennedy et al 2003;Soucek et al 2000), and elsewhere. Kleinmann (1989) estimated that, in the United States alone, more than 20,000 km of streams and rivers and more than 72,000 ha of lakes and reservoirs had been adversely affected by AMD; no comparable global estimate is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Bioassessment procedures have been used to evaluate aquatic systems impacted by environmental disturbances such as timber harvest (Williams, Warren, & Clingenpeel, 2002), industrial discharges (Diamond, Bressler, & Serveiss, 2002), and mine drainages (Soucek, Cherry, Currie, Latimer, & Trent, 2000;Cherry, Currie, Soucek, Latimer, & Trent, 2001;Grout & Levings, 2001;DeNicola & Stapleton, 2002). Research has been conducted on an array of coal mining impacts ranging from stream acidification (Guerold et al, 2000), sedimentation (Bonta, 2000), heavy metal influx (Clements, Carlisle, Lazorchak, & Johnson, 2000), and metals mobilized by acid mine drainage (AMD) (Cherry et al, 2001;Soucek, Schmidt, & Cherry, 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%