Close-Range Photogrammetry Meets Machine Vision 1990
DOI: 10.1117/12.2294328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory calibration and characterization of video cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system at City University has been successfully applied to a wide variety of engineering applications. 9. REFERENCES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The system at City University has been successfully applied to a wide variety of engineering applications. 9. REFERENCES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To examine the accuracy of camera calibration, one can compare the calculated camera orientation and lens distortion parameters with more accurate values obtainedusing other independent techniques (that are too time consuming or difcult to implement in large production wind tunnels). The aforementioned optimization method for camera calibration has been compared against the optical techniques described by Burner et al 25 and Burner. 26 The optical techniques may be more accurate, but require special laboratory equipment that may not be available or may be unsuitable for on-site calibration.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique does not provide an estimation of the principal distance, nor of the principal point offsets. However, other work reported by Robson et al (1993), based on the work of Burner et al (1990), has shown that the principal point offsets and their standard deviations can be determined for each camera relatively easily and used as a priori values in a subsequent bundle adjustment. (b) Test field calibration.…”
Section: Camera Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%