2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

-labeling of strong products of cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we have reduced the bound by . In [15] and [20], they obtained an upper bound for the -labeling number of the direct product of two graphs in terms of the maximum degrees of the graphs involved. We shall improve this bound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we have reduced the bound by . In [15] and [20], they obtained an upper bound for the -labeling number of the direct product of two graphs in terms of the maximum degrees of the graphs involved. We shall improve this bound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] the -numbers of the strong product of cycles are considered. In [15] and [20], they obtained a general upper bound for the -number of strong products in terms of maximum degrees of the factor graphs (and the product).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assume and . In [13] and [16], the -numbers of the strong product of cycles are considered. In this section, we obtain a general upper bound for the -number of strong products in terms of maximum degrees of the factor graphs (and the product).…”
Section: Strong Product Of Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it is not possible to compute λ-number of a graph in polynomial time unless P = NP. Therefore, the problem has been studied for many special classes of graphs, such as regular grids [1,2], product graphs [10,14], trees [4,18], planar graphs [17], generalized flowers [11], permutation and bipartite permutation graphs [15] and so on. For more details, one may refer to the surveys [3,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%