1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01389415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L 2 and intersection cohomologies for a polarizable variation of Hodge structure

Abstract: We consider a polarized variation of Hodge structure (V, Vz, S, F) of weight k, over a complex manifold X 1-16]. Here V denotes a locally constant sheaf of finite dimensional complex vector spaces, V z a sheaf of lattices in V, and F a decreasing filtration of Ox | by locally free sheaves of Ox-modules F p. By assumption, the filtration F induces Hodge structure of weight k on the stalks of V, and satisfies the Riemann bilinear relations, as welt as the transversality relation, relative to the fiat bilinear fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover it is an abelian full subcategory of MHW(L7), because we can take X such that X\U is a locally principal divisor and use 7, or j^ for the extension. Similarly it is stable by \// g9 (/) gjl for a function g on (7 for a general X and for the compatibility with its definition for a quasi-projective variety, it is enough to check (4.2.6) for X quasi-projective. We take a projective completion X such that X\X is a locally principal divisor, and take a refinement of the covering X = U U t such that X\U t is a w.l.p.d.…”
Section: K = K(@ X • (X a -Nj • (I E Ft) D T • (I T Ft)) W Where (X mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover it is an abelian full subcategory of MHW(L7), because we can take X such that X\U is a locally principal divisor and use 7, or j^ for the extension. Similarly it is stable by \// g9 (/) gjl for a function g on (7 for a general X and for the compatibility with its definition for a quasi-projective variety, it is enough to check (4.2.6) for X quasi-projective. We take a projective completion X such that X\X is a locally principal divisor, and take a refinement of the covering X = U U t such that X\U t is a w.l.p.d.…”
Section: K = K(@ X • (X a -Nj • (I E Ft) D T • (I T Ft)) W Where (X mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the filiations W (i} on M^ are constructed functorially by induction on i using W (i} on the other M 7 and FFon M r In fact this is just (3.23.13) if n = 1, and we can prove it by induction on n using (3.23.13). Clearly it is enough to show the assertion for a = 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that the degree of e in R V with respect to the filtration W (N (j) ∧ R ) is b = b1 − h1 for any j. Here R and b are given as follows: (See (7). We use h − 1 instead of h.)…”
Section: A Reduction Of the Sequential Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poincaré intersection form on H * (L) is nondegenerate, as usual, and also because of the Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations (38) on E.…”
Section: Examples Of Intersection Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%