2019
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20180084
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Paper aims:This research aims to evaluate factors that influence knowledge sharing in automotive production context in Brazil and China.Originality: Despite the growing recognition of the factors that enable knowledge sharing in organizations, our understanding about the unique challenges encountered by the blue-collar workers in a production context is rather limited. Also, the paper raises issues and challenges involved for production organizations to engage in cross-national knowledge sharing, which remain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Potentially significant knowledge sharing factors were selected based on a systematic literature review that started in 2010 (Muniz Jr. et al, 2010a, 2010b) and was updated through a systematic search on the web of science and scopus databases, using the descriptors “knowledge sharing” (Nakano & Muniz Jr., 2018). Items for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP‐IPC) analysis were applied and validated in pilot studies in Brazil (Muniz Jr et al, 2019). Follow up interviews with survey respondents revealed that the factors selected seem to provide sufficient construct and face validity, though for future research we would aim to test the validity of the items using Cronbach's Alpha.…”
Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by Saaty (1980) to some extent addresses these concerns. AHP, as a multi‐criteria decision method, breaks‐down complex decision‐making problems (i.e., with multiple judgments at different levels) into sub‐problems with hierarchical levels (see e.g., Muniz Jr et al, 2019). Each hierarchical level represents a set of attributes or alternatives related to each sub‐problem.…”
Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a MCDM method and is commonly used to assess strategy, performance, and ranking alternatives in supply chain and logistics (Sipahi & Timor, 2010). AHP, as a multi-criteria decision method, decomposes complex decision-making problems (i.e., with multiple judgments at different levels of criteria and alternatives) into sub-problems with hierarchical levels (see for example Muniz Jr. et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En tercer lugar, se analiza la condición de comunicaciones e incentivos, considerando que la recompensa y el reconocimiento, así como un clima para la comunicación abierta, estimulan significativamente la cultura de intercambio de conocimientos de la organización (Yap & Toh, 2020). Puntualmente, tanto las recompensas intrínsecas como extrínsecas son relevantes para promover el intercambio de conocimiento (Muniz et al, 2019). De la misma manera, en el contexto de las comunidades de práctica conformadas por pequeñas y medianas empresas, el sistema de recompensas es un factor que promueve el intercambio de conocimiento (Tan & Ramayah, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified