2021
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2020.1840876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Management, Absorptive and Dynamic Capacities and Project Success: A Review and Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge is the most important resource needed for project management, and a lack of knowledge management is one of the main reasons for project failure [75]. The same was confirmed in our research, so we agree with the statements of Gasik (2011) [75], Moud & Abbasnejad (2012) [50], and Emiliano de Souza et al (2022) [76] that during the implementation of the project, various forms of information and knowledge are generated in the organization, which must be captured and shared with other projects because, if this does not happen, they will be irretrievably lost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Knowledge is the most important resource needed for project management, and a lack of knowledge management is one of the main reasons for project failure [75]. The same was confirmed in our research, so we agree with the statements of Gasik (2011) [75], Moud & Abbasnejad (2012) [50], and Emiliano de Souza et al (2022) [76] that during the implementation of the project, various forms of information and knowledge are generated in the organization, which must be captured and shared with other projects because, if this does not happen, they will be irretrievably lost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is because they can effectively share and exploit the knowledge that they can thus develop in a more absorptive capacity. This knowledge-based cohesion within the team drives innovation performance (Nazari et al, 2021) and project success (Emiliano de Souza et al, 2021). A strong degree of cohesion in teams is more likely to produce better coordination and performance outcomes over time (Marques-Quinteiro et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the PMPs’ standardized environment may benefit from such learning and adaptation by complementing the effect of practices on performance and making the procedures more effective concerning the environment. However, despite the previous literature addressing the impact of AC on PP, the relationship between PP and knowledge management requires more investigation (Favoretto and Carvalho, 2021; Souza et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%