Knowledge, knowledge dynamics, and innovation

Abstract

Purpose – Knowledge is a strategic resource for firms and it can enable them to achieve competitive advantage. Large companies engaged in internationalization pay particular attention to knowledge as a source of innovation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate current debates in the field: the first is about cumulative vs composite knowledge; the second concerns the degree of diversity and redundancy in knowledge-based dynamics; and the third debate is about incremental vs radical innovation. Design/methodology/approach – The authors have used an inductive approach to perform a longitudinal case study of multinational corporation-semiconductor (MNC-SC). Total of 13 interviews were conducted over a four-year period. The MNC-SC case study has given the opportunity to analyse knowledge resources, knowledge, and innovation processes in a context of internationalization. Findings – The findings indicate that in order to achieve technological innovation in a context of internationalization, the company builds knowledge in a cumulative fashion, which can create a path dependency problem. To ensure complementarity between cross-functional teams located long distances from one another, and maximize the utilization of resources, MNC-SC must establish common standards. To maximize returns from composite knowledge, in a context of internationalization, knowledge diversity is preferable over redundancy. However, true knowledge transfer, sharing, and learning are limited. Combinatorial and incremental innovation through internationalization is a process based on trial and error; it maximizes technological performance and enables the company to fulfil needs without diverging from the technological trajectory of the SC industry. Originality/value – The internationalization process revealed limitations: limited understanding of the content of each knowledge module, competency traps, limited innovativeness, and therefore limited wealth creation.

Existing Knowledge Assets and Disruptive Innovation: The Role of Knowledge Embeddedness and Specificity

“…According to the knowledge-based view, the overall intellectual capital can be defined as the sum of all the intangible and knowledge-related resources that an organization is able to use in its productive processes [44]. As an asset or capital, knowledge can play a significant role in disruptive innovation [45,46]. Therefore, we examined the impact of features of existing knowledge assets (e.g., knowledge embeddedness and knowledge specificity) on disruptive innovation.…”

Commercialization of Innovations Through Internationalization: A Systematic Literature Review

“…In studies both from France and Croatia, considerable attention was paid to cooperation with universities. However, only two articles have been written on this topic (Dabic et al 2016, Scaringella 2016.…”

Innovative and motivational competence of leaders and its transformation in the context of digitalization

“…Most researchers [4], [12], [13], [14] define innovative characteristics as a set of certain professionalcompetencies.…”