[1993] Proceedings of the Second International Forum on Applications of Neural Networks to Power Systems
DOI: 10.1109/ann.1993.264314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge enhanced connectionist models for short-term electric load forecasting

Abstract: This paper addresses short-term electric load forecasting using machine learning and neural network techniques. Neural networks, though accurate in weekday load forecasting, are poor at forecasting maximum daily load, weekend and holiday loads. This necessitates development of a robust forecasting technique to complement the neural networks for enhanced reliability of forecast and improved overall accuracy. The statistical decision tree method produces robust forecasts and human intelligible rules. These rules… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where r is an overlap parameter. After the parameters of the membership functions have been found, the weights in layer 4 are obtained by using the competitive learning algorithm (Rumelhart & Zipses, 1985) as follows:…”
Section: Phase-i: Unsupervised Learning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where r is an overlap parameter. After the parameters of the membership functions have been found, the weights in layer 4 are obtained by using the competitive learning algorithm (Rumelhart & Zipses, 1985) as follows:…”
Section: Phase-i: Unsupervised Learning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the input variables and the estimated ones from the hybrid neural network have wide variations in magnitudes, they will cause convergence problem and the system will behave completely erratic. To circumvent this problem, the variables are scaled between 0.1 and 0.9 (Rahman, Drezga, & Rajagopalan, 1993). This is performed so as to maximise accuracy and minimise training time.…”
Section: Scaling Of the Variable Rangementioning
confidence: 99%