2015
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: PROSPERO systematic review protocol registration number CRD4201400882 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
182
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
10
182
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of over twenty studies with a mean gait analysis at 29.3 months (range between 3 weeks to 5.7 years) observed that altered biomechanics in all three planes are common after ACLR and may persist up to five years after ACLR. [88] A more recent systematic review and meta-analysis[89] compared the knee kinematic and kinetics during walking of ACLR knees to healthy controls and uninjured contralateral limbs. The analysis of thirty-four studies identified lower peak flexion moments during 6–12 months post-ACLR and lower peak flexion angles during 1–3 years and ≥3 years after ACLR.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review of over twenty studies with a mean gait analysis at 29.3 months (range between 3 weeks to 5.7 years) observed that altered biomechanics in all three planes are common after ACLR and may persist up to five years after ACLR. [88] A more recent systematic review and meta-analysis[89] compared the knee kinematic and kinetics during walking of ACLR knees to healthy controls and uninjured contralateral limbs. The analysis of thirty-four studies identified lower peak flexion moments during 6–12 months post-ACLR and lower peak flexion angles during 1–3 years and ≥3 years after ACLR.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of thirty-four studies identified lower peak flexion moments during 6–12 months post-ACLR and lower peak flexion angles during 1–3 years and ≥3 years after ACLR. [89] However, the pooled data provided evidence of no significant difference between peak knee adduction moments after 3 years following ACLR. [89] The recovery of normal neuromuscular control during daily activities such as gait may be significantly delayed after ACLR.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, nearly 70% show cartilage degeneration on MRI less than 3 years after ACLR 5 . A proposed mechanism for increased risk of development of knee OA after ACL injury and reconstruction is the evidence of abnormal knee biomechanics beginning early after ACLR as summarized in several recent systematic reviews 6; 7 . Data demonstrates that cartilage becomes conditioned to a typical loading environment 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While kinematic 7; 15; 16 and kinetic 6; 7; 17 changes to the ACLR knee have been described in all three planes of motion, the majority of studies have investigated joint biomechanics at a single time point following ACLR. Measurements at a single time point may not capture longer-term outcome of ACLR surgery, including changes that could occur in joint loading over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,23,24 The importance of the ACL in maintaining normal function has been identified in several studies that report common kinematic changes to the knee flexion angle and internal-external rotation angle of the knee during walking after ACLR. 15,23,24 It has been suggested that these kinematic changes shift the location of repetitive joint contact loads during walking to regions of cartilage not conditioned for these loads because of regional variations in both cartilage structure and biology. 3,8,9 If the new region of cartilage cannot adapt to the change in repetitive loading during ambulation, a degenerative pathway ensues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%