2014
DOI: 10.1021/cg500167a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kink Rate Model for the General Case of Organic Molecular Crystals

Abstract: Recently, a general mechanistic spiral growth model, including a kink rate expression that enables crystal morphology prediction for all kinds of organic molecules (both centric and noncentric), was developed. However, we have discovered that the kink rate model for the step velocity in solution growth is inconsistent with the attachment and detachment rate expressions for noncentric growth units at kink sites, so these expressions are revisited to make them selfconsistent. Here, we derive a new expression for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression for the step velocity of the ith edge is given by equation 16, where a P,i , u i and ρ i are the distance that the ith edge propagates with the addition of a new row, the net rate of solute attachment to kink sites on the ith edge (kink rate, see section 4.4), and the density of kink sites on the ith edge, respectively [112].…”
Section: Edges and Spiralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expression for the step velocity of the ith edge is given by equation 16, where a P,i , u i and ρ i are the distance that the ith edge propagates with the addition of a new row, the net rate of solute attachment to kink sites on the ith edge (kink rate, see section 4.4), and the density of kink sites on the ith edge, respectively [112].…”
Section: Edges and Spiralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 18 is this general expression for the kink rate u i on a step edge of an organic crystal containing n growth units [13,19,112] (n = 1 for centrosymmetric crystals and subscripts k and i correspond to the kink and edge, respectively; note also that the prefactor n was incorrectly omitted in our earlier formulations of equation 18). We use transition state theory (TST) [113] to develop expressions for the attachment and detachment rates to use within equation 18.…”
Section: Kink Rate Model For Spiral Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kink site potential energies U kink calculated for the obtuse and acute edges of the growth spirals on calcite (101¯4) surface are not equal to each other as shown in Table . As the attachment/detachment rate from the kink sites and the step velocity depends on the kink site potential energy, the U kink values suggest that the step velocities of obtuse and acute edges should be different. Therefore, the difference in the solid‐state interaction energies in the kink sites between acute and obtuse spiral edges provides a quantitative explanation for the presence of asymmetric growth spirals on the (101¯4) surface of calcite.…”
Section: Kink Site Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuvadia and Doherty developed a generalized expression for the kink rate u on a spiral edge on organic crystal surfaces that has n types of kink sites along the edge u=(j+)nk=1njk=1n(j+)n(j)(1) where j + is the attachment flux of growth units into the kink site and jk is the detachment flux from the kink site k . j + is independent of the specific kink site and depends only on supersaturation and solution composition, whereas jk depends on the solution chemistry and the local bonding energies for the kink site k . The quantity (j)(1) in Eq.…”
Section: Kink Rate For Inorganic Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where j 1 is the attachment flux of growth units into the kink site and j 2 k is the detachment flux from the kink site k. j 1 is independent of the specific kink site and depends only on supersaturation and solution composition, whereas j 2 k depends on the solution chemistry and the local bonding energies for the kink site k. 35,38,39 The quantity ðj 2 Þ ð'21Þ in Eq. 5 is given by…”
Section: New Kink Rate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%