1999
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Kinematic viscosities of ternary mixtures containing ethane-1,2-diol, 2-methoxyethanol and water from −10°C to 80°C
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
20
3
1
1
Citation Types
1
14
0
0
Year Published
Range
2000
20002026
2026Publication Types
Select...
21
3
Relationship
0
24
Authors
Journals
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
References 32 publications
1
14
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Experimental densities and viscosities, obtained from the measurements for liquid pure compounds and standard samples, have been presented in the Supporting information (SI) Table S1 together with the literature values. − We have found a good agreement between the experimental density data obtained in this work and the literature data for all chemicals with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) within 0.20%, as shown in Figure . Among them, large deviations of density are from EGEE compared with the work of Carvalho et al, which may be due to the difference of water content and purity for this solvent.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The difference of measuring methods and the materials used may result in the observed large deviations. A series of Ubbelohde capillary viscometers by manually measuring the efflux time and the given viscometer constants were used in the literature. ,− ,,,,,, In this work, a rolling-ball measuring principle was applied to measure the time using three inductive sensors.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative percent deviations [100 × (η lit – η exp )/η lit ] at T = 293.15–353.15 K of experimental viscosity results of pure components with literature values: (a) EGME: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; blue ▼, ref ; pink ◆, ref ; (b) EGEE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref ; (c) EGBE: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; and (d) MAE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Experimental densities and viscosities, obtained from the measurements for liquid pure compounds and standard samples, have been presented in the Supporting information (SI) Table S1 together with the literature values. − We have found a good agreement between the experimental density data obtained in this work and the literature data for all chemicals with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) within 0.20%, as shown in Figure . Among them, large deviations of density are from EGEE compared with the work of Carvalho et al, which may be due to the difference of water content and purity for this solvent.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The difference of measuring methods and the materials used may result in the observed large deviations. A series of Ubbelohde capillary viscometers by manually measuring the efflux time and the given viscometer constants were used in the literature. ,− ,,,,,, In this work, a rolling-ball measuring principle was applied to measure the time using three inductive sensors.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative percent deviations [100 × (η lit – η exp )/η lit ] at T = 293.15–353.15 K of experimental viscosity results of pure components with literature values: (a) EGME: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; blue ▼, ref ; pink ◆, ref ; (b) EGEE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref ; (c) EGBE: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; and (d) MAE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A survey of viscosity data reported for pure alkanediols shows that there is a notable scattering in comparison to the average values. Based on Table , the deviation of our data from literature varies from 0.28 to 16.79 for 1,3-propanediol at the temperature of 308.15 K. For our measurement the calculated relative standard uncertainty for viscosity is about 0.08. As can be seen, the agreement between the experimental and literature values was found to be satisfactory.…”
Section: Experimental
Section
mentioning
confidence: 65%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“… a Standard uncertainties u are u ( T ) = 0.01 K. Expanded uncertainty U for the density, kinematic viscosity, and refractive index are U (ρ) = 4 × 10 –3 g·cm –3 , U (ν) = 0.07 mm 2 ·s –1 , and U ( n D ) = 0.0001, respectively (0.95 level of confidence). b Ref . c Ref . d Ref . e Ref . f Ref . g Ref . h Ref . i Ref . j Ref . k Ref . l Ref . m Ref . n Ref . p Ref . q Ref . r Ref . s Ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Experimental densities and viscosities, obtained from the measurements for liquid pure compounds and standard samples, have been presented in the Supporting information (SI) Table S1 together with the literature values. − We have found a good agreement between the experimental density data obtained in this work and the literature data for all chemicals with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) within 0.20%, as shown in Figure . Among them, large deviations of density are from EGEE compared with the work of Carvalho et al, which may be due to the difference of water content and purity for this solvent.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The difference of measuring methods and the materials used may result in the observed large deviations. A series of Ubbelohde capillary viscometers by manually measuring the efflux time and the given viscometer constants were used in the literature. ,− ,,,,,, In this work, a rolling-ball measuring principle was applied to measure the time using three inductive sensors.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative percent deviations [100 × (η lit – η exp )/η lit ] at T = 293.15–353.15 K of experimental viscosity results of pure components with literature values: (a) EGME: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; blue ▼, ref ; pink ◆, ref ; (b) EGEE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref ; (c) EGBE: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; and (d) MAE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A survey of viscosity data reported for pure alkanediols shows that there is a notable scattering in comparison to the average values. Based on Table , the deviation of our data from literature varies from 0.28 to 16.79 for 1,3-propanediol at the temperature of 308.15 K. For our measurement the calculated relative standard uncertainty for viscosity is about 0.08. As can be seen, the agreement between the experimental and literature values was found to be satisfactory.…”
Section: Experimental
Section
mentioning
confidence: 65%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“… a Standard uncertainties u are u ( T ) = 0.01 K. Expanded uncertainty U for the density, kinematic viscosity, and refractive index are U (ρ) = 4 × 10 –3 g·cm –3 , U (ν) = 0.07 mm 2 ·s –1 , and U ( n D ) = 0.0001, respectively (0.95 level of confidence). b Ref . c Ref . d Ref . e Ref . f Ref . g Ref . h Ref . i Ref . j Ref . k Ref . l Ref . m Ref . n Ref . p Ref . q Ref . r Ref . s Ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Experimental densities and viscosities, obtained from the measurements for liquid pure compounds and standard samples, have been presented in the Supporting information (SI) Table S1 together with the literature values. − We have found a good agreement between the experimental density data obtained in this work and the literature data for all chemicals with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) within 0.20%, as shown in Figure . Among them, large deviations of density are from EGEE compared with the work of Carvalho et al, which may be due to the difference of water content and purity for this solvent.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The difference of measuring methods and the materials used may result in the observed large deviations. A series of Ubbelohde capillary viscometers by manually measuring the efflux time and the given viscometer constants were used in the literature. ,− ,,,,,, In this work, a rolling-ball measuring principle was applied to measure the time using three inductive sensors.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative percent deviations [100 × (η lit – η exp )/η lit ] at T = 293.15–353.15 K of experimental viscosity results of pure components with literature values: (a) EGME: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; blue ▼, ref ; pink ◆, ref ; (b) EGEE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref ; (c) EGBE: black ■, ref ; red ●, ref ; green ▲, ref ; and (d) MAE: black □, ref ; red ○, ref ; green △, ref ; blue ▽, ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A survey of viscosity data reported for pure alkanediols shows that there is a notable scattering in comparison to the average values. Based on Table , the deviation of our data from literature varies from 0.28 to 16.79 for 1,3-propanediol at the temperature of 308.15 K. For our measurement the calculated relative standard uncertainty for viscosity is about 0.08. As can be seen, the agreement between the experimental and literature values was found to be satisfactory.…”
Section: Experimental
Section
mentioning
confidence: 65%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“… a Standard uncertainties u are u ( T ) = 0.01 K. Expanded uncertainty U for the density, kinematic viscosity, and refractive index are U (ρ) = 4 × 10 –3 g·cm –3 , U (ν) = 0.07 mm 2 ·s –1 , and U ( n D ) = 0.0001, respectively (0.95 level of confidence). b Ref . c Ref . d Ref . e Ref . f Ref . g Ref . h Ref . i Ref . j Ref . k Ref . l Ref . m Ref . n Ref . p Ref . q Ref . r Ref . s Ref . …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%