2008
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011783-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

kinA mRNA is missing a stop codon in the undomesticated Bacillus subtilis strain ATCC 6051

Abstract: Several features distinguish laboratory and undomesticated strains of Bacillus subtilis. For example, unlike the laboratory strain 168, the undomesticated strain ATCC 6051 is deficient in sporulation in a rich sporulation medium, 2¾ SG. ATCC 6051 cannot induce transcription of the spoIIG operon, suggesting that this strain has a defect in initiation of sporulation. To determine the genetic difference between 168 and ATCC 6051, the DNA region responsible for the Spo " phenotype was transferred to strain 168. Ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, deletion of degS from ATCC 6051 and NCIB3610 results in different swarming motility phenotypes, indicating that there are differences in the DegU regulons of these two strains (23,42). Additionally, ATCC 6051 has recently been found to differ from strain NCIB3610 (used in this study) at at least two locations in its genome, at least one of which influences biofilm formation (24,25). Therefore, it was necessary to establish whether YuaB activates complex colony development by strain NCIB3610 and to assess if, like yvcA transcription, yuaB transcription was activated by DegUϳP, as DegU is known to have regulatory activity in both its nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated states (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, deletion of degS from ATCC 6051 and NCIB3610 results in different swarming motility phenotypes, indicating that there are differences in the DegU regulons of these two strains (23,42). Additionally, ATCC 6051 has recently been found to differ from strain NCIB3610 (used in this study) at at least two locations in its genome, at least one of which influences biofilm formation (24,25). Therefore, it was necessary to establish whether YuaB activates complex colony development by strain NCIB3610 and to assess if, like yvcA transcription, yuaB transcription was activated by DegUϳP, as DegU is known to have regulatory activity in both its nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated states (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clue to this question. Kobayashi et al (2008) reported that the KinA protein was degraded in an SsrA-dependent manner in Bacillus subtilis when a base-substitution mutation in kinA ORF eliminated the stop codon. Although degradation of the KinA protein is just a result of mutation, it is intriguing to speculate that regulatory system for ArfA expression has its origin in such a mutation-promoted trans-translation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seems most likely that the efficiency and kinetics of sporulation is not always increased but rather adjusted to specific niches. One wild isolate of B. subtilis, strain NCIB3610, bears a stop codon within the kinA gene, and is conditional for sporulation (73). In MSgg medium, NCIB3610 forms aerial structures, called fruiting bodies, that are preferential sites of spore formation (74), but it sporulates inefficiently in DSM (73).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One wild isolate of B. subtilis, strain NCIB3610, bears a stop codon within the kinA gene, and is conditional for sporulation (73). In MSgg medium, NCIB3610 forms aerial structures, called fruiting bodies, that are preferential sites of spore formation (74), but it sporulates inefficiently in DSM (73). Spore differentiation is ecologically beneficial, as spores will remain viable under harsh environmental conditions, but it is a time-consuming and energetically costly process, requiring the differential expression of over 10% of the genome over a period of 7 to 8 h (75,76).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%