2013
DOI: 10.1163/15406253-04001006 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: The central purposes of this article are twofold: (1) to give a brief sketch of contemporary scholarship on Kierkegaard’s relation to Schelling and Hegel, clarifying, by discussing the famous Kantian and Kierkegaardian paradoxes, how the spheres of existence—aesthetic, ethical, and immanent religious—represent failed ways of appropriating or “knowing” oneself, and (2) to clarify Johann Climacus’s distinction between “approximate” and “appropriate” knowledge by challenging Nathan Carson’s interpretation as pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles