Kesiapan Institusi Lokal dalam Menghadapi Bencana Tsunami: Studi Kasus Kelurahan Air Manis dan Kelurahan Purus, Kota Padang

Abstract

Aceh Tsunami’s in 2004 has a significant impact on Indonesia disaster management. Shifting of disaster management paradigm has directed to proactive preparedness that is involving some stakeholders including local institution like villages. At any level, the preparedness for the tsunami disaster of a government institution has been studied, including local government. However, in the lower level of local government such as villages have few of studies about that. Villages are institutions that deal directly with local communities. Therefore, the description of the preparedness/readiness of local institutions is needed. This study aims to give an overview of the readiness of local institutions in the face of the tsunami disaster by cases in the Air Manis Urban Village and Purus Village. Both of urban villages are located in the coastal area of Padang City which is one of the areas with high tsunami risk. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach, by using a primary data collection through in-depth interview with the key informant and secondary data collection through documents related to disaster management in Padang City. The local institution preparedness in both areas is identified through physical and non-physical aspects related to tsunami risk reduction. The results of the study showed that physically and non-physically Purus Village has better readiness compared to Air Manis Village. However, from the non-physical aspects of TRANTIB-PB and KSB as a representation of the involvement of local institutions in disaster management, it is still necessary to improve the governance in order not to become a mere formality. These two urban villages as a tourism destination are not considered in disaster management.

Persepsi Anggota, Dinamika Kelompok Pengelola Dan Pelestari Hutan (KPPH) dan Kelestarian Taman Hutan Raya (Tahura) di Kecamatan Kemiling Kota Bandar Lampung

“…Bencana yang terjadi di berbagai daerah di Indonesia berupa rusaknya kualitas tanah, banjir, dan tanah longsor antara lain akibat rusaknya kualitas sumber daya hutan (Mutolib et al 2015;Anam et al 2018). Kerusakan hutan menjadi penyebab hilangnya peluang Indonesia untuk menambah devisa negara dalam jumlah yang besar.…”

The Impact of Natural Disasters on Change of Travel Patterns and Tourist Type Who Visited Tourism Destination

“…Often disaster management at a tourism destination has not considered the presence of tourists in areas with the risk of natural disasters as a factor that adds to the vulnerability of the area. Besides that disaster management must pay attention to the characteristics of each region through the formulation of strategies, policies and programs and collaborative efforts involving all stakeholders (Anam et al, 2018).…”

“…So far, the involvement of various parties in disaster management efforts in Indonesia has been carried out, but their effectiveness and formulation still need to be studied. At the local level, local institutions in this case village institutions play an important role in the successful collaboration of the three parties (Anam et al, 2018). However, it is different from Muktaf (2017) research which precisely examines the development of disaster tourism, such as the Lava Tour, namely tourists are invited to surround the area affected by the eruption.…”

“…The government is able to use these three philosophies in disaster risk management through programs and policies to minimize the impact of disasters (Maarif, 2012), including involving local communities and institutions. So far, the threats and dangers of natural disasters are often only regarded as natural environmental processes, so that people are not considered in disaster risk management (Anam et al, 2018).…”

Estimation of Communities and Tourists Willingness to Pay for Tsunami Disaster Mitigation of Marine Tourism in the Kalianda Coastal Area, South Lampung Regency

“…According to Paramesti (2011) states that tsunami preparedness must involve many parties, especially people living in the area, so that the incurred losses can be minimized. Furthermore, according to Anam, Mutholib, Setiawan, Andini & Sefniwati (2018) stated that tsunami management is more proactive preparedness, this involves various parties including local institutions in the area.…”