2017
DOI: 10.1145/3072959.3073708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderings

Abstract: networks on production data and observe improvements over state-of-theart MC denoisers, showing that our methods generalize well to a variety of scenes. We conclude by analyzing various components of our architecture and identify areas of further research in deep learning for MC denoising.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
363
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
363
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In visualization, graphics and HDR imaging, neural networks have been used for predicting sky illumination for rendering [SBRCD17, HGSH* 17], denoising Monte Carlo renderings [KBS15, CKS*17, BVM*17], predicting HDR environment maps [ZL17a], reducing artefacts such as ghosting when fusing multiple LDR exposures to create HDR content [KR17] and for tone mapping [HDQ17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In visualization, graphics and HDR imaging, neural networks have been used for predicting sky illumination for rendering [SBRCD17, HGSH* 17], denoising Monte Carlo renderings [KBS15, CKS*17, BVM*17], predicting HDR environment maps [ZL17a], reducing artefacts such as ghosting when fusing multiple LDR exposures to create HDR content [KR17] and for tone mapping [HDQ17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the variance reduction techniques proposed over the years, MC denoising [SD11, SD12, RMZ13, KBS15], in particular, has helped to fuel the recent, rapid adoption of path tracing. MC denoisers for both high‐end production [BVM∗ 17, VRM∗ 18] and real‐time [CKS∗ 17, SKW∗ 17, SPD18] rendering systems have demonstrated impressive results at low sampling rates for their respective applications (16 samples/pixel for production, 1‐2 samples/pixel for real‐time). Still, their results could substantially improve if they could be provided input images that are more converged than the ones they usually operate on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jia et al [JDTG16] proposed to predict a dynamic convolution layer or a dynamic local filtering layer from input data and apply the layer on the input. The latter strategy, namely kernel prediction method, has been used for denoising bursts of images [MBC*18] and denoising Monte Carlo renderings [BVM*17; VRM*18]. Deformable convolutional network [DQX*17] predicts the sampling locations of the convolution operator and it was further improved by modulating the input feature amplitudes from different spatial locations [ZHLD18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and learn the kernel weights w (·,·) from a CNN model. Our strategy is similar to the kernel prediction method [JDTG16], which has been applied to denoising [MBC*18; BVM*17; VRM*18]. However, directly applying Equ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%