1958
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1958.01560020070008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keratotic Hemangiomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All Accepted for publication July 3,1967 -Biopsy of a small superficial lesion of angio¬ keratoma circumscriptum. All Accepted for publication July 3,1967 -Biopsy of a small superficial lesion of angio¬ keratoma circumscriptum.…”
Section: Report Of a Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All Accepted for publication July 3,1967 -Biopsy of a small superficial lesion of angio¬ keratoma circumscriptum. All Accepted for publication July 3,1967 -Biopsy of a small superficial lesion of angio¬ keratoma circumscriptum.…”
Section: Report Of a Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Dämmert8 has reviewed the earlier case reports. [2][3][4][5][6] Dämmert8 has reviewed the earlier case reports.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, it is described as hemangioma unilateralis naeviforme, 3 keratotic hemangioma, 4,5 naevus angiokeratoticus, 6 naevus keratoangiomatosus, 7 and papulous angiokeratoma 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term VH was first coined by Halter 3 in 1937 to report a 16‐year‐old boy presenting with a linear, purpuric cluster of plaques extending from the right buttock to the toes and associated with shortening and atrophy of the affected limb. Several studies have described similar lesions using various names, including angiokeratoma circumscriptum naeviforme, 4 angiokeratoma circumscriptum, 5,6 angiokeratoma corporis naeviforme, 7 and keratotic hemangioma 8 . Thus VH has frequently been mistakenly classified as a variety of angiokeratoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%