1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1073::aid-job943>3.0.co;2-7
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test
Abstract: SummaryThis study tests a model that uses organizational justice variables and the personality trait of negative aectivity to explain two forms of deviant employee behavior. Prior research suggests that deviance can be directed interpersonally or against organizations. We propose a model that links unfavorable perceptions of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice, as well as the dispositional trait of negative aectivity, to both types of deviant acts. To test the model, a survey was distributed to…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
429
43
40
23
Citation Types
14
388
2
7
Year Published
2001
2026
Publication Types
Select...
429
34
28
6
Relationship
4
493
Authors
Journals
Cited by 497 publications
(411 citation statements)
References 78 publications
14
388
2
7
“…Another finding of interest in our research was that NA and procedural justice were moderately negatively correlated in both samples. This finding is inconsistent with findings reported by Ball et al (1994) and Aquino, Lewis, and Bradfield (1999) who found that NA was not related to perceptions of procedural justice. The finding is, however, consistent with the suggestion of Organ and Konovsky (1989) that there may be a dispositional component in the tendency to perceive, or at least attend to, unfairness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Another finding of interest in our research was that NA and procedural justice were moderately negatively correlated in both samples. This finding is inconsistent with findings reported by Ball et al (1994) and Aquino, Lewis, and Bradfield (1999) who found that NA was not related to perceptions of procedural justice. The finding is, however, consistent with the suggestion of Organ and Konovsky (1989) that there may be a dispositional component in the tendency to perceive, or at least attend to, unfairness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the maximum for this construct is 5.50 and most deviant or undesirable behavior constructs have a relatively low mean like this study. For example, Aquino, Lewis, and Bradfield (1999) measured employee deviance using a 5-point Likert scale and reported the mean of this variable to 1.30 (standard deviation is .34). Dunlop and Lee (2004) measured workplace deviance behavior using a 5-point scale and reported a mean for this construct of 1.81 (standard deviation is .32).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, in relation to organisational justice, our findings indicate that procedural, interactional, and distributive justice are protective factors for workplace bullying among junior doctors. This is supported by the findings of previous studies . Several mechanisms may be proposed to explain these findings in the context of health care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
