1997
DOI: 10.1039/a700747g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Junctions between CuOx and ZnOy in sensors for CO and catalystsfor CO hydrogenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For its particular optical properties, Cu 2 O is applied in optical devices and solar cells [1]. Recently, Cu 2 O is also reported as a promising negative electrode for Li ion battery [2][3][4] and gas sensors [5]. The approaches to prepare Cu 2 O thin films including physical vapor deposition (PVD) [6], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [7] and electrochemical deposition (ECD) have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its particular optical properties, Cu 2 O is applied in optical devices and solar cells [1]. Recently, Cu 2 O is also reported as a promising negative electrode for Li ion battery [2][3][4] and gas sensors [5]. The approaches to prepare Cu 2 O thin films including physical vapor deposition (PVD) [6], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [7] and electrochemical deposition (ECD) have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the CO 2 conversion and methanol selectivity are improved when the fourth element is added. With the introduction of Zn, the activity increased greatly, which might be due to the fact that the active site is Cu δ+ -O-Zn 2+ [31,32]. However, the activity improvement is slight for Ce-P.…”
Section: Catalytic Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless in CO2 hydrogenation the CH30H/CH4 ratio was higher fiian for CO (i.e., CO2 hydrogenation-conversion to methanol was more selective than CO, with a methanol/methane ratio of 430). Furthermore, the overall conversion of CO was much higher than for ZrO2 alone (10.34 versus 1.83% [13]) and so one must look for active sites at the Cu/ZrO2 interface [14]. Finally Cu/ZrO2 is about three times more active in CO hydrogenation [ 14] than Cu/ZnO (producing 39.7/zmol CH3OH/gcat/min [10]) for which special sites exist at the interface of Cu and ZnO which are also thought to be important and may involve formate species bridging between Cu and Zn ions [15] which convert to methanol [14].…”
Section: Co/cozmentioning
confidence: 98%