2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jovian temperature and cloud variability during the 2009–2010 fade of the South Equatorial Belt

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an analysis of the 2010 fading of the South Equatorial Belt (SEB), Fletcher et al (2011) present observations at 8.6 and 10.8 µm which reveal that the top of the Northern Red Oval is slightly colder than the ambient temperature at the same pressure level, similar to findings for the GRS and Oval BA (e.g., Conrath et al 1981;Cheng et al 2008;Fletcher et al 2010). This suggests that air is baroclinically rising along the center axis of the oval.…”
Section: Secondary Circulationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an analysis of the 2010 fading of the South Equatorial Belt (SEB), Fletcher et al (2011) present observations at 8.6 and 10.8 µm which reveal that the top of the Northern Red Oval is slightly colder than the ambient temperature at the same pressure level, similar to findings for the GRS and Oval BA (e.g., Conrath et al 1981;Cheng et al 2008;Fletcher et al 2010). This suggests that air is baroclinically rising along the center axis of the oval.…”
Section: Secondary Circulationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This suggests that air is baroclinically rising along the center axis of the oval. Fletcher et al (2011) further noticed that the lower-than-ambient temperature above the Northern Red Oval extends over an area that is smaller than that covered by the aerosols. This implies that the subsiding part of the secondary circulation probably does take place inside the oval; the temperature is only belowambient at the top of the vortex where air is rising, not subsiding.…”
Section: Secondary Circulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is a reasonable result not only because of the smaller time difference between both profiles but also because of the visual appearance of the cloud morphology in both years. The appearance is very similar despite recent large-scale cyclic variations such as the Fade (2009−10) and Revival (2010) of the SEB (Pérez-Hoyos et al 2012;Fletcher et al 2011) or the impact of a 500 m object with Jupiter in 2009 at −55 • latitude (Sánchez-Lavega et al 2010), which resulted in a large dark debris cloud that moved at the same velocity as the general flow as retrieved from HST (Hammel et al 2010) and ground-based observations (Sánchez-Lavega et al 2011). The only notorious change between these two epochs occurred at latitude 27−28 • , where 2008 HST data showed a westward acceleration of the A74, page 8 of 11 jet (Asay-Davis et al 2011).…”
Section: Long-term Variationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The mean intensity of the winds has shown temporal variability on the order of ∼10 ms −1 (Asay-Davis et al 2011) and a remarkable stability of the latitudes of the zonal jets' maximum velocities. Although some of the bands' morphology changes in periods of years (Peek 1958;Chapman & Reese 1968;Reese 1972;Minton 1972a,b;Smith & Hunt 1976;Sánchez-Lavega & Rodrigo 1985;Rogers 1995;Sánchez-Lavega & Gómez 1996;Sánchez-Lavega et al 1996;Fletcher et al 2011;Pérez-Hoyos et al 2012), the wind profile maintains a remarkable temporal stability. Furthermore, this zonal wind profile is not strongly affected by the dynamic perturbations at cloud level, such as those developed by convective storms like the South Equatorial Belt Disturbance (SEBD; Sánchez-Lavega et al 1996;Sánchez-Lavega & Gómez 1996) and the North Temperate Belt Disturbance (NTBD) (García-Melendo et al 2005Sánchez-Lavega et al 2008;Barrado-Izagirre et al 2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irregular and brusque variations caused by storms or structural changes in the planet's belts have also been observed in giant planets (e.g. Tejfel et al 1994;Sánchez-Lavega 1994;Rogers 2009;Fletcher et al 2011;Pérez-Hoyos et al 2012), and they are likely to happen in ultracool dwarfs as well. Photometric data from different epochs, separated by months, are already available for a few ultracool dwarfs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%