2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2008.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Power and Rate Control in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Game-Theoretical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, with (3) and (15), the PU's achievable rate in the j th sub-channel is 2 2 2 2 log (1 (1) (3)) / 3…”
Section: Network Modeling and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, with (3) and (15), the PU's achievable rate in the j th sub-channel is 2 2 2 2 log (1 (1) (3)) / 3…”
Section: Network Modeling and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address both system efficiency and user fairness issues of CR networks, the authors in [14] proposed a distributed power control strategy by using a cooperative Nash bargaining game model. In [15], a joint power and rate control strategy were presented for SUs on the basis of a cooperative game theoretic framework. Three auction-based schemes were proposed in [16] for multimedia streaming over CR networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we decompose the Problem(Relaxed_MINP-i) into three independent sub-problems: Sub-Problem 1: (20) subject to: Constraints (12-13).…”
Section: Problem(relaxed_minp-i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another distributed approach was presented to jointly consider routing and dynamic spectrum allocation in cognitive radio ad hoc network so that the network throughput is maximized without causing baleful interference to other licensed users [17]. A part of researches investigate to devise energy efficient routing protocols [18][19] or adopt a game-theoretic perspective to handle power control problem in the cognitive radio networks [20][21][22][23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CR technology promises to improve the network spectrum-utilization efficiency by allowing cognitive secondary users (SUs) to intelligently sense and opportunistically access those spectrum holes temporarily unused by license-holding primary users (PUs). There are two basic spectrum-sharing schemes for coexisting PU and SU networks: One is spectrum overlay, in which SUs detect and avoid overlapping with active PUs in frequency [9], [11], and the other is spectrum underlay, in which SUs spread its transmission over the wide spectrum to lower the transmit power density inflicted on overlapping PUs [12], [14], [15]. In addition, these two spectrum-sharing methods can be interwoven to collect the benefits of both [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%