2017
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2017.2657698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Assignment of Power, Routing, and Spectrum in Static Flexible-Grid Networks

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel network planning strategy to jointly allocate physical layer resources together with the routing and spectrum assignment in transparent nonlinear flexible-grid optical networks with static traffic demands. The physical layer resources, such as power spectral density, modulation format, and carrier frequency, are optimized for each connection. By linearizing the Gaussian noise model, both an optimal formulation and a low complexity decomposition heuristic are proposed. Our methods mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we also show that our proposed system, which is based on the CLGN model and the SA algorithm, speeds up the optimization process and provides similar resource usage, compared to the published benchmark system in [3]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we also show that our proposed system, which is based on the CLGN model and the SA algorithm, speeds up the optimization process and provides similar resource usage, compared to the published benchmark system in [3]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…When M c = 9, the CLGN model has a greater than 60% probability of outperforming the GNTR model in transmission reach. In this simulation scenario, the simulation settings are similar to settings used in [2], [3], and [4]. Hence, based on these link level analyses, we can conclude that the CLGN model has better performance in estimating PLIs than the GNTR model for many cases of practical interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations