2021
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1682
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The use of molecular data to generate phylogenetic inferences to support plant classification has been constantly increasing over the last 30 years (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the premise of MSC is unlinked markers, it is mostly used for nuclear markers, although it might be used for organellar data, to evaluate conflict among genes (Pérez-Escobar et al, 2021;Zuntini et al, 2021). Although these two approaches are fundamentally different, they often result in similar topologies for data sets where the underlying signal is strong, as demonstrated by our results (see comparison in Appendix S6) and observed in others groups such as Apiaceae (Clarkson et al, 2021), Myrtales (Maurin et al, 2021), Ochnaceae (Shah et al, 2021), and Sapindaceae (Buerki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Since the premise of MSC is unlinked markers, it is mostly used for nuclear markers, although it might be used for organellar data, to evaluate conflict among genes (Pérez-Escobar et al, 2021;Zuntini et al, 2021). Although these two approaches are fundamentally different, they often result in similar topologies for data sets where the underlying signal is strong, as demonstrated by our results (see comparison in Appendix S6) and observed in others groups such as Apiaceae (Clarkson et al, 2021), Myrtales (Maurin et al, 2021), Ochnaceae (Shah et al, 2021), and Sapindaceae (Buerki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An increasing number of studies are relying on the “universal” for flowering plants Angiosperm-353 set of probes ( Johnson et al, 2019 ) suggesting that clade-specific probes may not be necessary. However, it is feasible to combine both universal and clade-specific probes in a single study ( Larridon et al, 2020 ; Shah et al., 2021 ; Siniscalchi et al., 2021 ), and this has the benefit of further increasing the number of loci available for phylogenomic comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been successfully implemented with low-quality material such as herbarium specimens (Brewer et al, 2019;Shee et al, 2020) and performed well for resolving shallow-level relationships (e.g., radiations [Larridon et al, 2020;Shee et al, 2020] and even at the intraspecific level [Van Andel et al, 2020;Beck et al, 2021;Slimp et al, 2021]). A few studies have compared the performance of Angiosperms353 with other taxon-specific probe sets (e.g., in Cyperus L. [Larridon et al, 2020], in the subtribe Malinae of the Rosaceae [Ufimov et al, 2021], and in the Ochnaceae [Shah et al, 2021]), but only Larridon et al (2020) directly tested the mergeability of different data sets. Alternatively, new lineage-specific kits are being designed that incorporate part or all of the Angiosperms353 targets (e.g., for the Melastomataceae [Jantzen et al, 2020] and the Gesneriaceae [Ogutcen et al, 2021]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%