Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Modeling Of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Socia 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w18-1108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Johns Hopkins or johnny-hopkins: Classifying Individuals versus Organizations on Twitter

Abstract: Twitter accounts include a range of different types of users.While many individuals use Twitter, organizations also have Twitter accounts.Identifying opinions and trends from Twitter requires the accurate differentiation of these two groups. Previous work presented a method for determining if an account was an individual or organization based on account profile and a collection of tweets. We present a method that relies solely on the account profile, allowing for the classification of individuals versus organ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first gathered the unique Twitter user IDs of all the Twitter users in our data set. Following the approach outlined in [ 25 ], we used a naïve Bayes machine learning model to classify the tweeters into individuals versus organizations. We used a published data set that contained 8945 Twitter users and their profile descriptions, which human coders used to annotate users as individual or institutional [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first gathered the unique Twitter user IDs of all the Twitter users in our data set. Following the approach outlined in [ 25 ], we used a naïve Bayes machine learning model to classify the tweeters into individuals versus organizations. We used a published data set that contained 8945 Twitter users and their profile descriptions, which human coders used to annotate users as individual or institutional [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No multilingual organization recognition system exists; so, we limit our evaluation to the only publicly-available dataset of personvs-organization which was scored by the Humanizr [54] and Demographer [79] systems. This data consists of a uniform sample across Twitter accounts, which were approximately 10% organizations.…”
Section: Comparison Systems Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we observe in other data sets that usernames are some of the most frequent tokens classified as entities (Ritter et al, 2011;Derczynski et al, 2016). For our experiments, we consider all usernames as non-entities, as otherwise, identifying these using character features would be trivial, and typing entities would be similar to the task of Twitter handle classification (McCorriston et al, 2015;Wood-Doughty et al, 2018), which is outside the scope of the current paper.…”
Section: Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%