2016
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job-exposure matrix for the assessment of alkylphenolic compounds

Abstract: currently ~2300 cases and ~4200 controls), to study risk factors and possible gene-environment interactions; international pooling of case-control studies; using existing cohorts (e.g. EPIC) ; and aiming to register all Dutch ALS cases. Consistent positive associations between smoking and ALS were observed within PAN and EPIC, indicating that a similar approach for occupational risk factors would be informative. Because each study design has its advantages and disadvantages , neurodegenerative disorders should… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method does not intend to identify new occupational risks, but may improve estimates for the most common agents known or suspected to have an adverse effect on work-related asthma till now 3 4. We developed the OAsJEM for the two-digit to four-digit ISCO-88 job codes, the most commonly used classification in Europe 34. However, the ISCO-88 classification was originally defined for economic statistical purposes, which may not be optimal for evaluation of occupational exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method does not intend to identify new occupational risks, but may improve estimates for the most common agents known or suspected to have an adverse effect on work-related asthma till now 3 4. We developed the OAsJEM for the two-digit to four-digit ISCO-88 job codes, the most commonly used classification in Europe 34. However, the ISCO-88 classification was originally defined for economic statistical purposes, which may not be optimal for evaluation of occupational exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%