2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job characteristics, motivators and stress among information technology consultants: A structural equation modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was utilized to conduct factor analysis of a combined model of the KEEN-TTI Performance DNA utilizing AMOS software. SEM techniques have been utilized to evaluate relationships among human behavior [15], human motivation [16], as well as student motivation [17]. The current study structural model consists of three latent variables (Behavior, Motivation, and Skills) with covariances between them ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was utilized to conduct factor analysis of a combined model of the KEEN-TTI Performance DNA utilizing AMOS software. SEM techniques have been utilized to evaluate relationships among human behavior [15], human motivation [16], as well as student motivation [17]. The current study structural model consists of three latent variables (Behavior, Motivation, and Skills) with covariances between them ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature available associated with the demand-control model associated the ability of these three variables to explain stress in the workplace. The results of these prior studies showed that these three are able to significantly explain stress or job strains (Karasek & Theorell, 1990;Jonge, Janssen & Van Breukelen, 1996;Demerouti et al, 2001;Houkes et al, 2001;Aurbech et al, 2003;Johnson, 1986;Wallgren & Hanse 2007). Nonetheless, there are available literatures that exposed the ability of the said variables for explaining turnover intention (Borda & Norman, 1997;Rahim, 1997;Price & Mueller, 1986;Kim et al, 1996;Gaertner, 2000;Van Dyne et al, 2004;Viator, 2001;Allen, 2001).…”
Section: Turnover: the Intent Factormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further, a select number of total sample (a total of 50 participants) will be given both TTI survey. Consistent with Pistrui study (2013), the Structural Equation Modeling or SEM techniquewhich is useful understanding and evaluating the relationshipbetween human behavior and human motivation (Wallgren and Hanse, 2007;Williams et al, 2003) and Cronbach's Alpha, an accepted measure of internal consistency or reliability will be used to perform factor analysis of a combined model (Cronbach, 1951). …”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%