2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(00)00198-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JNdi-1: a neodymium isotopic reference in consistency with LaJolla neodymium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

78
493
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,459 publications
(577 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
78
493
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained for these materials are 143 Nd/ 144 Nd = 0.512113 ±2 (2σ m , n = 64) and 143 Nd/ 144 Nd = 0.512991 ±4 (2σ m , n = 16) for JNdi-1 and BHVO-2, respectively. These results are in agreement with previously published data (62,63 Here, e Nd is calculated relative to ( 143 Nd/ 144 Nd) CHUR 0.512638 (64). Uncertainties for e Nd are reported as 2σ.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results obtained for these materials are 143 Nd/ 144 Nd = 0.512113 ±2 (2σ m , n = 64) and 143 Nd/ 144 Nd = 0.512991 ±4 (2σ m , n = 16) for JNdi-1 and BHVO-2, respectively. These results are in agreement with previously published data (62,63 Here, e Nd is calculated relative to ( 143 Nd/ 144 Nd) CHUR 0.512638 (64). Uncertainties for e Nd are reported as 2σ.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The measured Nd isotopic ratios were normalized to 146 Nd/ 144 Nd = 0.7219. During the Nd isotopic measurements, the isotopic ratios measured for the standards, i.e., La Jolla and JNdi-1 (supplied by the Geological Survey of Japan), were 0.511856 ± 0.000007 (2s, n = 9) and 0.512112 ± 0.000006 (2s, n = 29), respectively, and were in good agreement with those reported by O'Nions et al (1977) and Tanaka et al (2000). As the contribution of blank to each sample was less than 1%, no blank correction was performed.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The mass-fractionation correction was made by monitoring 146 Nd/ 144 Nd and applying an exponential-fractionation correction. Samples were analyzed during nine sessions, and each sample was bracketed with analyses of the JNdi-1 neodymium isotopic standard (Tanaka et al, 2000). The samples were standard corrected to a value of 0.512118 ±7 for the JNdi-1 neodymium isotopic standard, which is based on our own in-laboratory cross calibration between JNdi-1 and La Jolla, which is within error of the value of 0.512115 ±7 reported by (Tanaka et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%