2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022291718398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies made on Arabidopsis thaliana mutants defective in genes involved in BRs signalling revealed the involvement of several components of BR-signalling pathway in the control of floral initiation and showed that the attenuation of BRs 0 signalling delays flowering in this plant species (Clouse 2008;Domagalska et al 2007;Turk et al 2005;Yu et al 2008). In our case, the application of 10 -8 -10 -14 M 24-epibrassinolide or the synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone in the earlier (V3/4) stages resulted in the delayed flowering and lower number of ears per plants, which agrees with the results of Janeczko et al (2003), who found that the application of 10 -8 or 10 -9 M 24-epibrassinolide (but not 10 -6 or 10 -7 M) to 18-days old seedlings of Arabidopsis reduced the number of plants in generative Table 6 The effect of 24-epibrassinolide (E) and synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone (A) on the number of fertile ears per plant, the ear length, the number of kernel rows and the average number of kernels per row in three maize genotypes (inbred lines 2023 and CE704, F1 hybrid 2023 9 CE704) Table 7 The effect of 24-epibrassinolide (E) and synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone (A) on the dry weight of whole ear, the dry weight of cob, the dry weight of 100 kernels and the shelling percentage in three maize genotypes (inbred lines 2023 and CE704, F1 hybrid 2023 9 CE704) Kęsy et al (2003) described the inhibition of flowering in Pharbitis nil seedlings that were treated with 10 -7 or 10 -6 M brassinolide or castasterone before or during flowering-inductive dark period. On the other hand, we observed a significant decrease in the length of period to anthesis and silking when maize plants were treated by foliar spray with BRs during V6/7 stages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent studies made on Arabidopsis thaliana mutants defective in genes involved in BRs signalling revealed the involvement of several components of BR-signalling pathway in the control of floral initiation and showed that the attenuation of BRs 0 signalling delays flowering in this plant species (Clouse 2008;Domagalska et al 2007;Turk et al 2005;Yu et al 2008). In our case, the application of 10 -8 -10 -14 M 24-epibrassinolide or the synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone in the earlier (V3/4) stages resulted in the delayed flowering and lower number of ears per plants, which agrees with the results of Janeczko et al (2003), who found that the application of 10 -8 or 10 -9 M 24-epibrassinolide (but not 10 -6 or 10 -7 M) to 18-days old seedlings of Arabidopsis reduced the number of plants in generative Table 6 The effect of 24-epibrassinolide (E) and synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone (A) on the number of fertile ears per plant, the ear length, the number of kernel rows and the average number of kernels per row in three maize genotypes (inbred lines 2023 and CE704, F1 hybrid 2023 9 CE704) Table 7 The effect of 24-epibrassinolide (E) and synthetic androstane analogue of castasterone (A) on the dry weight of whole ear, the dry weight of cob, the dry weight of 100 kernels and the shelling percentage in three maize genotypes (inbred lines 2023 and CE704, F1 hybrid 2023 9 CE704) Kęsy et al (2003) described the inhibition of flowering in Pharbitis nil seedlings that were treated with 10 -7 or 10 -6 M brassinolide or castasterone before or during flowering-inductive dark period. On the other hand, we observed a significant decrease in the length of period to anthesis and silking when maize plants were treated by foliar spray with BRs during V6/7 stages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…By using this developmental criterion, it is found that bri1 and BR biosynthetic mutants det2, cpd and dwf4 are early flowering [70]. In addition, exogenous application of BR or the steroids, androstenedione and androsterone, cause late flowering in wild type Arabidopsis plants, suggesting that BR signaling pathway performs a repressive role in floral transition [70,71]. In Arabidopsis, transcription of the central floral repressor FLC and its three homologs, FLOWERING LOCUS M (FLM), MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING 4 (MAF4) and MAF5, are depressed in BR mutants and genetic studies demonstrate that BR antagonizes the autonomous pathway by constitutively activating FLC expression during vegetative growth [70].…”
Section: Role Of Br In Floral Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, shoot and root growth of the common model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [29] and of sunflower [39] were demonstrated to be influenced by PRG in a dose-dependent manner. The acceleration of flowering was observed in A. thaliana and wheat exposed to micromolar concentrations of PRG [40,41]. The involvement of PRG in reproduction processes in plants has been further indicated by the PRG stimulation of tube growth of mature tobacco pollen [42], and by increasing levels of endogenous PRG during the germination of kiwifruit pollen [43].…”
Section: Progesteronementioning
confidence: 99%