2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jarosite, argon diffusion, and dating aqueous mineralization on Earth and Mars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, minerals generated by low-temperature water-rock interaction may persist on the surface of Earth (e.g., Landis et al, 2005) or Mars for protracted periods of time. Measurements of diffusion parameters and closure temperatures for these phases are needed to determine if they can indeed remain closed to Ar at surface temperatures at billionyear time scales (Kula and Baldwin, 2011;Ren and Vasconcelos, 2019b). Challenges in determining diffusion parameters for hydrous phases include a lack of information on their thermal behavior during heating in vacuum (Gaber et al, 1988;Lee et al, 1991) and the possibility that Ar is released during phase transformation and not by volume diffusion (Vasconcelos et al, 1995).…”
Section: Detrital Mica 40 Ar/ 39 Ar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, minerals generated by low-temperature water-rock interaction may persist on the surface of Earth (e.g., Landis et al, 2005) or Mars for protracted periods of time. Measurements of diffusion parameters and closure temperatures for these phases are needed to determine if they can indeed remain closed to Ar at surface temperatures at billionyear time scales (Kula and Baldwin, 2011;Ren and Vasconcelos, 2019b). Challenges in determining diffusion parameters for hydrous phases include a lack of information on their thermal behavior during heating in vacuum (Gaber et al, 1988;Lee et al, 1991) and the possibility that Ar is released during phase transformation and not by volume diffusion (Vasconcelos et al, 1995).…”
Section: Detrital Mica 40 Ar/ 39 Ar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jarosite comprises ~10% in outcrop at the Meridiani Planum, the landing site of the Opportunity rover [ Christensen et al , ], while smaller but significant amounts have also been recently discovered in parts of Mawrth Vallis [ Farrand et al , ], Valles Marineris [ Milliken et al , ], Noctis Labyrinthus [ Weitz et al , ; Thollot et al , ], NE Syrtis Major [ Ehlmann and Mustard , ], and Gale Crater [ Léveillé et al , ]. In addition to serving as a mineralogical indicator of aqueous activity on the Martian surface [e.g., Christensen et al , ], jarosite is amenable to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating [e.g., Lueth et al , ] and can therefore be additionally used to estimate the time since water was last present at a particular location [ Kula and Baldwin , ]. Laboratory studies indicate that jarosite has a limited stability field and can only be precipitated from highly acidic (pH < 3), oxidizing aqueous fluids in a sulfur‐bearing system [e.g., Baron and Palmer , ; Bigham et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mojave 2 mineralogy comprises substantial amounts of both plagioclase and jarosite, both of which host K, but which have different Ar release temperatures. Jarosite releases Ar at temperatures less than 500°C, whereas plagioclase retains the vast majority of its Ar to above 500°C (Cassata et al , 2009; Kula and Baldwin, 2011). Accordingly, an SAM experiment was devised to heat the Mojave 2 sample twice and validated by using the SAM testbed before its execution on Mars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%