1995
DOI: 10.1049/ip-gtd:19952098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative techniques for the solution of complex DC-rail-traction systems including regenerative braking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, the rectifier substation is modeled by Norton's equivalent source [13,14] in which I ss and R ss represent the Norton's short-circuit current and the Norton's resistance, respectively; R U1 and R U2 are the conductor resistances of the up-track sections; R D1 and R D2 are the conductor resistances of the down-track sections; P U1 and P D1 are the power consumptions of the running trains on the up-track and the down-track. The diode placed at the substation terminal is used to prevent any negative current flowing into the substation.…”
Section: Railway Power Supply Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3, the rectifier substation is modeled by Norton's equivalent source [13,14] in which I ss and R ss represent the Norton's short-circuit current and the Norton's resistance, respectively; R U1 and R U2 are the conductor resistances of the up-track sections; R D1 and R D2 are the conductor resistances of the down-track sections; P U1 and P D1 are the power consumptions of the running trains on the up-track and the down-track. The diode placed at the substation terminal is used to prevent any negative current flowing into the substation.…”
Section: Railway Power Supply Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of DC railway power system is as simple as DC linear circuits unless traction power load model is taken into account. From the literature [11][12][13][14] and also proof by simulation experiences, the current injection method or alternatively current-vector iterative method (CIM) is more efficient than any others. However, for a large-scale DC power network, several hundred nodes or up to a thousand nodes, incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient (ICCG) method [15] to handle large sparse matrices is preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai, Y et al compared iterative methods for the conductance vector and current vector. This comparison indicated that the current vector is more efficient and that regenerative energy can be easily applied [2]. Various studies have investigated railway powerflow incorporating energy storage systems to reduce substation peaks as well as the efficient use of regenerative energy…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, an iterative method should be applied to determine the powerflow. The Newton-Raphson method or Gauss Seidel method are generally used for powerflow calculations [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a comprehensive approach, which performs the interface between the AC substation and the DC railway system, is should be considered. Much research has been carried out on this topic and various systems have been proposed, as documented in the literature [3][4][5][6][7]. These research efforts can be categorized into two techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%