2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0499-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item analysis of university-wide multiple choice objective examinations: the experience of a Nigerian private university

Abstract: Teachers and Students worldwide often dance to the tune of tests and examinations. Assessments are powerful tools for catalyzing the achievement of educational goals, especially if done rightly. One of the tools for ‘doing it rightly’ is item analysis. The core objectives for this study, therefore, were: ascertaining the item difficulty and distractive indices of the university wide courses. A range of 112–1956 undergraduate students participated in this study. With the use of secondary data, the ex-post facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The categorical variables were counted using frequency and percentages, P<0.05 was considered to be statistically signi cant. Item analysis was conducted based on the following analysis: (I) extreme group comparison, items should discriminate between the scoring group of the upper 27% and lower 27% [21] and (II) item-total correlations the correlation between the score of each item and the total score of the scale. Items with a critical ratio (CR)>0.3 or an item-total correlation between 0.30 and 0.80 were retained [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorical variables were counted using frequency and percentages, P<0.05 was considered to be statistically signi cant. Item analysis was conducted based on the following analysis: (I) extreme group comparison, items should discriminate between the scoring group of the upper 27% and lower 27% [21] and (II) item-total correlations the correlation between the score of each item and the total score of the scale. Items with a critical ratio (CR)>0.3 or an item-total correlation between 0.30 and 0.80 were retained [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu, melalu analisis butir soal akan mendapatkan umpan balik yang nantinya dapat dijadikan acuan dalam pengambilan keputusan. Soal yang masuk kategori layak dapat langsung digunakan, soal dengan kategori kurang layak dapat direvisi, sedangkan soal dengan kategori tidak layak dapat digugurkan sehingga harus dihapus atau diganti dengan soal lainnya [18], [19]. Namun sayangnya, pengetahuan dan keterampilan guru dalam melakukan analisis butir soal masih tergolong rendah [20].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The concurrent validity between the PCSCCS-M and the C-SCGS was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Item analysis was performed using the following analyses: (a) extreme group comparison (item discrimination, an item should be able to discriminate between the upper 27% and lower 27% scoring groups) [32]; (b) corrected item-total correlations; (c) factor loadings; (d) Cronbach's alpha if an item was deleted; (e) and communities. Items with a criterial value (CR) < 3.0, a corrected item-total correlation < 0.30, factor loading < 0.45, and a community < 0.20 and whose deletion caused an increase of 0.5 or more in the alpha coefficient for the overall scale were excluded.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%