2012
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2012.713504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It is about time: Daily relationships between temporal perspective and well-being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also supported Carelli et al’s (2011) division of future TP into separate positive and negative scales, consistent with each temporal orientation having positive and negative aspects (Rush and Grouzet 2012). Positive and negative future TPs were only modestly correlated (.36), suggesting that future orientations are differentiated by affect just as past TPs are.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The study also supported Carelli et al’s (2011) division of future TP into separate positive and negative scales, consistent with each temporal orientation having positive and negative aspects (Rush and Grouzet 2012). Positive and negative future TPs were only modestly correlated (.36), suggesting that future orientations are differentiated by affect just as past TPs are.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The design allows only for a snapshot of mood on a single occasion. Future research might distinguish trait and state elements of TP in everyday contexts, e.g., through using a longitudinal experience sampling method (Rush and Grouzet 2012). Future studies should seek for potential mediators of the obtained relationships, i.e., specific mechanisms and processes that may be sensitive to the individual’s TP, focusing especially on retrieval of autobiographical memories and on mood-regulation strategies congruent with the TP (Matthews and Stolarski 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, researchers often fail to specify the conceptual form they apply, even at times conflating trait and state‐based forms. We advise scholars to pay careful attention to the operationalization of time perspective and temporal focus and specify whether individual traits and situational states apply (e.g., Foo et al, ; Kairys & Liniauskaite, ; Rush & Grouzet, ). The importance of the trait versus state distinction is noted by Efrat‐Treister and colleagues (this issue).…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%