2000
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isozyme Variation in Wild and Cultivated Species of the Genus Trifolium L. (Leguminosae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic variability of phenotypes ranged from 0.07 (T. glomeratum) to 0.61 (T. campestre) with an average of 0.30 based on the polymorphic information content (PIC). Levels of variability in this study were comparable to those of many enzymatic variation studies on Trifolium populations (Kongkiatngam et al 1995;Lange & Schifino-Wittmann 2000;Malaviya et al 2005Malaviya et al , 2008Dias et al 2008b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The genetic variability of phenotypes ranged from 0.07 (T. glomeratum) to 0.61 (T. campestre) with an average of 0.30 based on the polymorphic information content (PIC). Levels of variability in this study were comparable to those of many enzymatic variation studies on Trifolium populations (Kongkiatngam et al 1995;Lange & Schifino-Wittmann 2000;Malaviya et al 2005Malaviya et al , 2008Dias et al 2008b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Several researchers agree with the highest variability for the EST enzymatic system among and within Trifolium species (Lange & Schifino-Wittmann 2000;Malaviya et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For plant breeders, the species is attractive due to its qualities as perenity, cold tolerance and tolerance to soils with high aluminum and manganese contents (Kappel, 1967;Moraes et al, 1989). Previous studies with few accessions of the species disclosed a high intraspecific variation when isoenzymatic (Lange and Schifino-Wittmann, 2000), SSR markers and morphoagronomic characteristics (Conterato et al, 2010a) were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, RAPD markers are largely limited in the analysis of population structure since a complete genotypic determination is hampered by their dominant nature (Lynch and Milligan 1994). In contrast, isozymes as codominant markers are useful to estimate the allelic frequency and population genetic parameters and have proved reliable in genetic studies with red clover natural populations (Hagen and Hamrick 1998, Lange and Schifino-Wittmann 2000, Semerikov et al 2002, Mosjidis et al 2003 and cultivars (Kongkiatngam et al 1995, Yu et al 2001. Different aspects of the diversity can be analyzed by the use of molecular and biochemical markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%