2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01931.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of AtSUC2 promoter‐GFP‐marked companion cells for patch‐clamp studies and expression profiling

Abstract: These authors contributed equally to this work. SummaryK channels control K homeostasis and the membrane potential in the sieve element/companion cell complexes. K channels from Arabidopsis phloem cells expressing green¯uorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the AtSUC2 promoter were analysed using the patch-clamp technique and quantitative RT-PCR. Single green¯uorescent protoplasts were selected after being isolated enzymatically from vascular strands of rosette leaves. Companion cell protoplasts, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In protoplasts of companion cells from main leaf veins, AKT2 is expressed essentially along with KAT1, the twin of KAT2. Instantaneous current of AKT2-type was not detected in these cells, but the time-dependent inward current (KAT1 type) recorded displayed a voltage-dependent Ca 2ϩ block attributable to AKT2 subunits (47). The absence of instantaneous current might be explained by the weakness of the leak current in AKT2/KAT1 heteromers, as shown in Baizabal-Aguirre et al (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In protoplasts of companion cells from main leaf veins, AKT2 is expressed essentially along with KAT1, the twin of KAT2. Instantaneous current of AKT2-type was not detected in these cells, but the time-dependent inward current (KAT1 type) recorded displayed a voltage-dependent Ca 2ϩ block attributable to AKT2 subunits (47). The absence of instantaneous current might be explained by the weakness of the leak current in AKT2/KAT1 heteromers, as shown in Baizabal-Aguirre et al (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The two genes are co-expressed in the phloem vasculature. AKT2 is expressed in phloem throughout the whole plant (44,46,47), and KAT2 is expressed in the leaf minor vein phloem (36). AKT2 and KAT2 transcripts are also co-localized in guard cells (41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on quantitative real-time PCR, leaf phloem cells express AKT2 and KAT1 Shaker genes at much higher levels than KAT2 (23). Thus, expression of the kat2 domneg construct under control of KAT2 promoter may mainly affect K in channel activity in guard cells, leaving phloem K in channels largely unaffected.…”
Section: Discussion Large Reductions In Gckin Activity Do Not Affect mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-strand cDNA was prepared using the M-MLV-RT kit (Promega) and diluted for qPCR 20-fold in water. Quantification and calculation of actin and marker transcripts were performed by real-time PCR as described previously (Ivashikina et al, 2003) using the ABsolute SYBR Capillary Mix (ABgene). The following primers were used: ACT2/8fwd (59-GGTGATGGTGTGTCT-39), ACT2/ 8rev (59-ACTGAGCACAATGTTAC-39), TPC1fwd (59-CTGTGTATCTA-CTGCTC-39), TPC1rev 59-ACGAAATATGTAATGCTC-39), VHP2;1+2fwd (59-TTTAGTGCG TATATGGAC-39),VHP2;1+2rev (59-CTTCTTACTTCG-TTGACA-39), VHP1;1fwd (59-CAGTATATTCGTTAGCTT-39), VHP1;1rev (59-TGATAACTTTAGGGGTC-39), VHA-a2fwd (59-TGTTCCGATGTATC-AGA-39), and VHA-a2rev (59-CAAATGGGAATTTTACCT-39).…”
Section: Real-time Qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%