2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of a Genomic Region Affecting Most Components of Metabolic Syndrome in a Chromosome-16 Congenic Rat Model

Abstract: Metabolic syndrome is a highly prevalent human disease with substantial genomic and environmental components. Previous studies indicate the presence of significant genetic determinants of several features of metabolic syndrome on rat chromosome 16 (RNO16) and the syntenic regions of human genome. We derived the SHR.BN16 congenic strain by introgression of a limited RNO16 region from the Brown Norway congenic strain (BN-Lx) into the genomic background of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) strain. We compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study provides a complementary view to a recently published study by Sedova et al (2016) , which carried out blood pressure and metabolic testing and an appraisal of SNVs on a single SHR congenic strain for chromosome 16. Although these two studies highlight some genes in common (such as the plausible candidates Lpl and Gatad2a ), our study, of congenic strains on chromosomes 12 and 16, was carried out in linkage regions to adipocyte insulin resistance that we had defined previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our study provides a complementary view to a recently published study by Sedova et al (2016) , which carried out blood pressure and metabolic testing and an appraisal of SNVs on a single SHR congenic strain for chromosome 16. Although these two studies highlight some genes in common (such as the plausible candidates Lpl and Gatad2a ), our study, of congenic strains on chromosomes 12 and 16, was carried out in linkage regions to adipocyte insulin resistance that we had defined previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1641851) strains were maintained at the Institute of Medical Biology and Genetics, Charles University in Prague. To derive SHR- Lx .PD5 PD- Zbtb16 and SHR- Lx .PD5 SHR- Zbtb16 congenic strains, a marker-assisted backcross breeding approach was used, as described previously ( 12 , 22 , 23 ). In short, SHR rats were crossed with SHR- Lx .PD5 rats, and the subsequent F1 hybrids were repeatedly backcrossed to SHR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2293729) strains are maintained at the Institute of Medical Biology and Genetics, Charles University in Prague. In order to derive the BN-Dca congenic strain and the BN-Lx.Dca double-congenic strain, we employed the marker-assisted backcross breeding approach as described previously (Seda et al, 2002;Šedová et al, 2012;Sedova et al, 2016). In short, the SHR-Dca rats were crossed with the other progenitor strain, i.e., BN/Cub or BN-Lx, for derivation of BN-Dca and BN-Lx.Dca, respectively.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Bn-dca And Bn-lxdca Congenic Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%